Copeland C E, Mitchell K A, Brumback R J, Gens D R, Burgess A R
Section of Orthopaedics, The R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, The University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore 21201, USA.
J Orthop Trauma. 1998 Jun-Jul;12(5):315-9. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199806000-00003.
To determine and compare the mortality rates of patients with bilateral versus unilateral femoral fractures and to determine the contribution of the femoral fracture to, and identify risk factors for, such mortality.
Retrospective analysis using trauma registry data on consecutive blunt trauma patients with unilateral (800 patients, group I) or bilateral (eighty-five patients, group II) femoral fractures.
Univariate data analysis was performed to compare the groups' ages, Injury Severity Scores, Glasgow Coma Scale values, mortality, and the presence of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine variables statistically associated with mortality.
Group II patients had a significantly higher Injury Severity Score (30.2 versus 24.5, p < 0.001), lower Glasgow Coma Scale value (12.3 versus 13.1, p = 0.05), higher mortality rate (25.9 vs 11.7%, p < 0.001), and higher incidence of ARDS (15.7 versus 7.27%, p = 0.014) than group I patients. Group II patients also had significantly more closed head injuries, open skull fractures, intraabdominal injuries requiring surgical intervention, and pelvic fractures; the rates of thoracic injury were similar. Regression analysis of variables evident on admission revealed a significant correlation between bilateral femoral fractures and death; however, other factors (shock, closed head injury, and thoracic injury) had much stronger correlations with mortality.
Patients with bilateral femoral fractures have a significantly higher risk of death, ARDS, and associated injuries than patients with unilateral femoral fractures. This increase in mortality is more closely related to associated injuries and physiologic parameters than to the presence of bilateral femoral fractures. The presence of bilateral femoral fractures should alert the clinician to the likelihood of associated injuries, a higher Injury Severity Score, and the potential for a more serious prognosis.
确定并比较双侧与单侧股骨骨折患者的死亡率,确定股骨骨折对死亡率的影响,并识别此类死亡率的危险因素。
采用创伤登记数据对连续的单侧(800例患者,I组)或双侧(85例患者,II组)股骨骨折钝性创伤患者进行回顾性分析。
进行单因素数据分析以比较两组患者的年龄、损伤严重度评分、格拉斯哥昏迷量表值、死亡率以及成人呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的发生率。进行逻辑回归分析以确定与死亡率有统计学关联的变量。
与I组患者相比,II组患者的损伤严重度评分显著更高(30.2对24.5,p<0.001),格拉斯哥昏迷量表值更低(12.3对13.1,p = 0.05),死亡率更高(25.9%对11.7%,p<0.001),ARDS发生率更高(15.7%对7.27%,p = 0.014)。II组患者的闭合性颅脑损伤、开放性颅骨骨折、需要手术干预的腹部损伤和骨盆骨折也明显更多;胸部损伤的发生率相似。对入院时明显的变量进行回归分析显示双侧股骨骨折与死亡之间存在显著相关性;然而,其他因素(休克、闭合性颅脑损伤和胸部损伤)与死亡率的相关性更强。
与单侧股骨骨折患者相比,双侧股骨骨折患者死亡、发生ARDS及合并相关损伤的风险显著更高。死亡率的增加与合并损伤和生理参数的关系比与双侧股骨骨折的存在更为密切。双侧股骨骨折的存在应提醒临床医生注意合并损伤的可能性、更高的损伤严重度评分以及更严重预后的可能性。