• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Is screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm acceptable to the population? Selection and recruitment to hospital-based mass screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

作者信息

Lindholt J S, Juul S, Henneberg E W, Fasting H

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Viborg Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

J Public Health Med. 1998 Jun;20(2):211-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024745.

DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024745
PMID:9675742
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to analyse whether the selection and recruitment for hospital-based mass screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is acceptable for the population according to the criteria from the Council of Europe.

METHODS

A random sample of 4404 65-73-year-old males were invited to hospital-based mass screening for AAA. As methods of secondary recruitment, they could change their time of appointment, and non-responders were reinvited once.

RESULTS

The attendance rate was 76 per cent; 4.2 per cent had AAA. Men with cardiopulmonary and vascular diseases had higher attendance rate (80.5 per cent), and prevalence of AAA (9.1 per cent). Men with potentially mobility-disabling diseases also had a higher attendance rate (80.4 per cent). However, possible unfavourable social selection was noticed in the group of retired men with no information of former occupation. They had 68.5 per cent attendance, and 7.6 per cent AAA. If true, this selection decreases the number of potentially diagnosed AAA by only 2 per cent. Opportunity of revised appointment and reinvitation of non-responders increased the primary attendance of 65 per cent to 76 per cent. More AAA were found at secondary scans (6.3 per cent compared with 3.9 per cent).

CONCLUSION

The attendance rate fell markedly with age, but the recruitment was high even at the age of 73, and travel distance and social class did not markedly influence uptake. A positive morbidity selection to screening for AAA was observed for cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases and potentially mobility-disabling diseases. Furthermore, higher prevalence of AAA was found for initial nonattenders. Thus, screening for AAA seems acceptable to the population, and extra efforts to increase the attendance are beneficial without increased costs per diagnosed AAA. Finally, if mass-screening proves to be cost-ineffective, selective screening of patients with hypertension or ischaemic heart disease might be beneficial.

摘要

相似文献

1
Is screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm acceptable to the population? Selection and recruitment to hospital-based mass screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
J Public Health Med. 1998 Jun;20(2):211-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024745.
2
Mass or high-risk screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Br J Surg. 1997 Jan;84(1):40-2.
3
Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人的腹主动脉瘤超声筛查
Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan;22(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.07.026. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
4
Risk factors associated with increased prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in women.与女性腹主动脉瘤患病率升高相关的风险因素。
Br J Surg. 2016 Aug;103(9):1132-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10179. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
5
Reasons for non-participation in population-based abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.参与人群腹部主动脉瘤筛查的原因。
Br J Surg. 2014 Apr;101(5):481-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9434. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
6
Impact of the first 5 years of a national abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme.国家腹主动脉瘤筛查计划实施头 5 年的影响。
Br J Surg. 2016 Aug;103(9):1125-31. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10173. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
7
Hospital based screening of 65-73 year old men for abdominal aortic aneurysms in the county of Viborg, Denmark.丹麦维堡郡针对65至73岁男性进行的基于医院的腹主动脉瘤筛查。
J Med Screen. 1996;3(1):43-6. doi: 10.1177/096914139600300111.
8
Influence of rurality, deprivation and distance from clinic on uptake in men invited for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.农村、贫困和距诊所距离对接受邀请进行腹主动脉瘤筛查的男性的影响。
Br J Surg. 2015 Jul;102(8):916-23. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9803. Epub 2015 May 7.
9
Current prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 70-year-old women.70 岁女性的腹主动脉瘤当前患病率。
Br J Surg. 2013 Feb;100(3):367-72. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8984. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
10
Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk women.高危女性的腹主动脉瘤超声筛查。
Br J Surg. 2021 Oct 23;108(10):1192-1198. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab220.

引用本文的文献

1
A population-based screening study for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes in Danish postmenopausal women: acceptability and prevalence.丹麦绝经后女性心血管疾病和糖尿病的基于人群的筛查研究:可接受性和患病率
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Feb 5;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0758-8.
2
Prevalence and trends of the abdominal aortic aneurysms epidemic in general population--a meta-analysis.一般人群中腹主动脉瘤流行的患病率和趋势——一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 2;8(12):e81260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081260. eCollection 2013.
3
Ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: an evidence-based analysis.
腹主动脉瘤的超声筛查:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(2):1-67. Epub 2006 Jan 1.
4
Office-based ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.基于诊室的腹主动脉瘤超声筛查。
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Mar;58(3):e172-8.
5
Geography, private costs and uptake of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a remote rural area.偏远农村地区腹主动脉瘤筛查的地理因素、个人成本与接受情况
BMC Public Health. 2006 Mar 29;6:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-80.
6
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA): cost-effectiveness of screening, surveillance of intermediate-sized AAA, and management of symptomatic AAA.腹主动脉瘤(AAA):筛查、中等大小腹主动脉瘤监测及症状性腹主动脉瘤管理的成本效益
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2005 Oct;18(4):345-67. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2005.11928095.
7
Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial.腹主动脉瘤筛查:单中心随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2005 Apr 2;330(7494):750. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38369.620162.82. Epub 2005 Mar 9.