Huncharek M, Muscat J, Geschwind J F
Meta-Analysis Research Group, Dunwoody, GA 30338, USA.
Anticancer Res. 1998 May-Jun;18(3B):1931-4.
The role of pre-operative radiation therapy in the treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer is unclear. The objective of this report is to present a meta-analysis of the published clinical trial data on this topic to determine whether pre-operative radiation improves survival in patients with this disease.
Data from 5 randomized trial were pooled using the meta-analytic techniques previously described by Peto et al. Three and five year survival were compared between patients receiving pre-operative radiation therapy followed by cystectomy versus patients treated with cystectomy alone.
A summary odds ratio was calculated following a statistical analysis showing a lack of heterogeneity among the included studies in terms of their estimate of effect. The calculated Peto odds ratio was 0.71 favoring the use of preoperative radiation (95% CI 0.48-1.06). Due to possible biases in this original analysis due to study design deficiencies, a sensitivity analysis showed a "corrected" odds ratio of 0.94 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.57- 1.55, a non-statistically significant result.
The available clinical trial data do not support a role for routine use of pre-operative radiation therapy in the treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer. Additional well designed trials are needed to address this issue.
术前放疗在肌肉浸润性膀胱癌治疗中的作用尚不清楚。本报告的目的是对已发表的关于该主题的临床试验数据进行荟萃分析,以确定术前放疗是否能提高该病患者的生存率。
使用Peto等人先前描述的荟萃分析技术汇总来自5项随机试验的数据。比较接受术前放疗后行膀胱切除术的患者与单纯行膀胱切除术的患者的3年和5年生存率。
在进行统计分析后计算出汇总优势比,结果显示纳入研究在效应估计方面缺乏异质性。计算出的Peto优势比为0.71,支持使用术前放疗(95%可信区间0.48 - 1.06)。由于原始分析可能因研究设计缺陷而存在偏差,敏感性分析显示“校正”后的优势比为0.94,95%可信区间为0.57 - 1.55,结果无统计学意义。
现有的临床试验数据不支持在肌肉浸润性膀胱癌治疗中常规使用术前放疗。需要进行更多设计良好的试验来解决这个问题。