Suppr超能文献

电化学发光免疫分析法检测癌胚抗原、前列腺特异性抗原和甲胎蛋白。多中心评估的临床结果。

Elecsys CEA, PSA and AFP. Clinical results of a multicentre evaluation.

作者信息

Uhl W, Chan D W, Jones K, Kelley C, Assmann G, von Eckardstein A, Sägers A, Yvert J P, Schneider A M, Torralba A, Fuentes-Arderiu X, Gonzalez de la Presa B, Vives M, Greiling H, Eberle A, Niederau C M, Cremer P, Reiter W, Vogeser M, Neumeier D, Luppa P, Huber U

机构信息

Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Penzberg, Germany.

出版信息

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1998;110 Suppl 3:51-61.

PMID:9677672
Abstract

Three tumormarker assays, Elecsys CEA, PSA and AFP, have been evaluated in an international multicentre study to characterize their clinical performance and to verify the comparability with the corresponding tests of the Enzymun-Test product line and other methods. For each of the markers results were obtained from four laboratories. On the basis of 314 and 199 specimens respectively, (preliminary) reference ranges could be established for CEA and PSA. For the prostate marker, the age dependence of the antigen level could be clearly confirmed. Mean concentrations range between 0.51 ng/ml (< 40 years) and 3.57 ng/ml (> 70 years). Referring to CEA, 95th percentiles of 4.31 ng/ml and 2.69 ng/ml were elaborated for smokers and nonsmokers. In general, good to excellent correlations (r > 0.98) were found between the Elecsys and Enzymun-Tests. Regarding the systematic comparability of both systems, most of the slopes derived from the individual method comparison studies are within the +/- 10% range of the respective standardization results. The specific distribution pattern of the individual tumormarker values elaborated with sample material of known clinical background, reflects the well established categorization of different benign and malignant diseases according to their characteristic marker levels. Of utmost importance, however, is the excellent comparability of the Elecsys assays with the corresponding Enzymun-Tests and the FDA approved AIA 1200 tests from TOSOH in follow-up studies. Almost superimposable concentration curves guarantee that identical diagnostic information is derived from all three methods. Especially for PSA, a series of measurements on sera of prostatectomized patients proved the usability and clinical value of the test also for this particular indication. For either one of the Elecsys tests, the feasibility of using plasma as sample material was verified.

摘要

在一项国际多中心研究中对三种肿瘤标志物检测方法,即罗氏电化学发光法癌胚抗原(Elecsys CEA)、前列腺特异抗原(PSA)和甲胎蛋白(AFP)进行了评估,以确定其临床性能,并验证与酶免疫检测产品线的相应检测方法及其他方法的可比性。每种标志物的检测结果均来自四个实验室。分别基于314份和199份标本,可为癌胚抗原和前列腺特异抗原建立(初步)参考范围。对于前列腺标志物,可明确确认抗原水平与年龄的相关性。平均浓度范围在0.51纳克/毫升(<40岁)至3.57纳克/毫升(>70岁)之间。关于癌胚抗原,分别得出吸烟者和非吸烟者的第95百分位数为4.31纳克/毫升和2.69纳克/毫升。总体而言,罗氏电化学发光法检测与酶免疫检测之间具有良好至极优的相关性(r>0.98)。关于两个系统的系统可比性,个体方法比较研究得出的大多数斜率在各自标准化结果的±10%范围内。用已知临床背景的样本材料得出的个体肿瘤标志物值的特定分布模式,反映了根据其特征性标志物水平对不同良性和恶性疾病进行的既定分类。然而,至关重要的是,在后续研究中,罗氏电化学发光法检测与相应的酶免疫检测以及经美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的东曹公司的AIA 1200检测具有极佳的可比性。几乎重叠的浓度曲线确保从这三种方法均可获得相同的诊断信息。特别是对于前列腺特异抗原,对前列腺切除患者血清进行的一系列检测证明了该检测方法对于这一特定适应症的可用性和临床价值。对于罗氏电化学发光法的任何一种检测,均验证了使用血浆作为样本材料的可行性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验