Irwin D E
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign 61820, USA.
Cogn Psychol. 1998 Jun;36(1):1-27. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0682.
Three experiments examined whether processes devoted to word recognition and word identification are suppressed during saccades, as most eye movement and reading researchers implicitly assume. In the first two experiments, subjects made short or long saccades while performing lexical decisions; lexical decision latency and accuracy were unaffected by saccade distance, and post-saccadic processing time was reduced when a long as opposed to a short saccade was made. Experiment 3 showed that word identification is more accurate when a long as opposed to a short saccade separates the presentation of a word and the presentation of a mask. These results demonstrate that lexical processing is not suppressed during saccades, so saccade durations should be taken into account in eye movement studies of reading. The implications of the results for current theories of cognitive suppression during saccades are discussed.
三项实验研究了正如大多数眼动和阅读研究人员暗中所假设的那样,在扫视过程中致力于单词识别和单词辨认的过程是否会受到抑制。在前两项实验中,受试者在进行词汇判断时进行短扫视或长扫视;词汇判断潜伏期和准确性不受扫视距离的影响,并且当进行长扫视而非短扫视时,扫视后处理时间会缩短。实验3表明,当一个单词的呈现和一个掩蔽刺激的呈现之间间隔长扫视而非短扫视时,单词辨认会更准确。这些结果表明,在扫视过程中词汇加工不会受到抑制,因此在阅读的眼动研究中应考虑扫视持续时间。讨论了这些结果对当前关于扫视过程中认知抑制理论的影响。