Irwin David E, Brockmole James R
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 61820, USA.
Psychol Sci. 2004 Jul;15(7):467-73. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00703.x.
Some cognitive processes are suppressed during saccadic eye movements, whereas others are not. In two experiments, we investigated the locus of this interference effect. In one experiment, subjects decided whether pictured items were objects or nonobjects while making saccades of different lengths. Saccade distance had no effect on response time, indicating that saccades do not interfere with object recognition. However, in a second experiment, in which subjects decided whether pictured items faced to the left or to the right, response time increased with saccade distance, indicating that processing was suppressed during the saccade. These results (along with others) suggest that dorsal-stream (where) processes are suppressed during saccades, whereas ventral-stream (what) processes are not. Because the dorsal stream is instrumental in generating saccades, we propose that cognitive saccadic suppression results from dual-task interference within this visual subsystem.
在快速眼动期间,一些认知过程会受到抑制,而另一些则不会。在两项实验中,我们研究了这种干扰效应的位置。在一项实验中,受试者在进行不同长度的扫视时,判断图片中的物品是物体还是非物体。扫视距离对反应时间没有影响,这表明扫视不会干扰物体识别。然而,在第二项实验中,受试者判断图片中的物品是向左还是向右,反应时间随着扫视距离的增加而增加,这表明在扫视过程中处理过程受到了抑制。这些结果(以及其他结果)表明,在扫视期间,背侧流(where)过程受到抑制,而腹侧流(what)过程则不受抑制。由于背侧流在产生扫视中起作用,我们提出认知性扫视抑制是由这个视觉子系统内的双任务干扰导致的。