McHenry H M, Berger L R
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis 95616, USA.
J Hum Evol. 1998 Jul;35(1):1-22. doi: 10.1006/jhev.1997.0197.
New discoveries of A. africanus fossils from Member 4 Sterkfontein reveal a body form quite unlike earlier Australopithecus species. The new adult material consists of over 48 fore- and hindlimb specimens and includes an associated partial skeleton, Stw 431. The forelimbs and relatively large: the average size of their joints corresponds to a modern human with body mass of 53 kg. The hindlimbs are much smaller with an average size matching a modern human of only 33 kg. Analyses of the Stw 431 partial skeleton confirm these results. In contrast, A. afarensis and anamensis more closely approximate a human pattern of forelimb joint size. This is an unanticipated complication in our understanding of early human evolution. In general, craniodental morphology tracks time in species of Australopithecus: A. anamensis (3.5-4.1 Ma) is the the most primitive with a strongly sloping symphysis, large canine roots, etc., A. afarensis (3.0-3.6 Ma) is less primitive, and A. africanus (2.6-3.0 Ma) shares many derived characteristics with early Homo (e.g., expanded brain, reduced canine, bicuspid lower third premolar, reduced prognathism, greater flexion of the cranial base, deeper TMJ). the new postcranial material, however, reveals an apparently primitive morphology of relatively large forelimb and small hindlimb joints resembling more the pongid than the human pattern. More pongid-like proportions are also present in the two known associated partial skeletons of H. habilis (OH 62 KNM-ER 3735). This may imply either (1) that A. africanus and H. habilis evolved craniodental characters in parallel with the lineage leading to later Homo, or (2) that fore- to hindlimb proportions of A. afarensis (and perhaps A. anamensis) evolved independent of the lineage leading to Homo and does not imply a close phylogenetic link with Homo. Both of these explanations or any other phylogeny imply homoplasy.
来自斯泰克方丹4号成员的非洲南方古猿化石新发现揭示了一种与早期南方古猿物种截然不同的身体形态。新的成年个体材料包括48个以上的前肢和后肢标本,还包括一具相关的部分骨骼,即Stw 431。前肢相对较大:其关节的平均尺寸与体重53千克的现代人相当。后肢则小得多,平均尺寸仅与体重33千克的现代人相当。对Stw 431部分骨骼的分析证实了这些结果。相比之下,阿法南方古猿和原初南方古猿的前肢关节大小更接近人类模式。这是我们在理解早期人类进化过程中一个意想不到的复杂情况。一般来说,颅骨牙齿形态在南方古猿物种中随时间变化:原初南方古猿(距今350万至410万年)是最原始的,其耻骨联合强烈倾斜,犬齿根部较大等;阿法南方古猿(距今300万至360万年)不那么原始;而非洲南方古猿(距今260万至300万年)与早期人属有许多衍生特征相同(例如,脑容量扩大、犬齿缩小、下第三前磨牙双尖、面部突出度降低、颅底弯曲度增大、颞下颌关节更深)。然而,新的颅后材料显示出一种明显原始的形态,即前肢关节相对较大而后肢关节较小,更类似于猩猩而不是人类模式。在能人已知的两具相关部分骨骼(OH 62、KNM-ER 3)中也存在更类似猩猩的比例。这可能意味着要么(1)非洲南方古猿和能人在与导致后来人属的谱系平行的过程中进化出了颅骨牙齿特征,要么(2)阿法南方古猿(可能还有原初南方古猿)的前后肢比例是独立于导致人属的谱系进化而来的,并不意味着与人类有密切的系统发育联系。这两种解释或任何其他系统发育关系都意味着趋同进化。