Willig D S, Turski P A, Frayne R, Graves V B, Korosec F R, Swan J S, Mistretta C A, Grist T M
Dept. of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53792, USA.
Radiology. 1998 Aug;208(2):447-51. doi: 10.1148/radiology.208.2.9680574.
To compare the delineation of stenosis at the carotid artery bifurcation on three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) digital subtraction angiographic (DSA) images with that on two-dimensional (2D) and 3D time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiographic images.
Twenty-six patients with 29 carotid artery bifurcations and symptoms of cerebral ischemia underwent 3D MR DSA. A time-resolved series was generated with 3D MR DSA after the bolus injection of gadodiamide. The resolution for a carotid artery examination was 0.4 x 0.4 x 1.0 mm, with volumes reconstructed at 4.5-second intervals. The 3D MR DSA images were compared with contemporaneously acquired unenhanced 2D and 3D TOF images. Two observers ranked the 2D and 3D TOF MR angiographic and 3D MR DSA images according to the following: (a) stenosis delineation, (b) internal carotid artery delineation, (c) intravascular signal intensity, and (d) diagnostic confidence.
The mean ranking for diagnostic confidence was 1.10 (1 = best technique, 3 = worst technique) for 3D MR DSA. Compared with the pooled 2D TOF and 3D TOF ranks, the 3D MR DSA rank was significantly better (P < .01). Similar levels of statistical significance were found for the other criteria.
Three-dimensional MR DSA improves the delineation of carotid arterial stenosis by virtually eliminating saturation effects and reducing intravoxel dephasing. Surface morphology and nearly occluded vessels ("string sign") were easily identified. Confidence in identifying carotid arterial occlusions was also very high with this technique.
比较三维(3D)磁共振(MR)数字减影血管造影(DSA)图像与二维(2D)及三维时间飞跃(TOF)MR血管造影图像对颈动脉分叉处狭窄的描绘。
26例有29个颈动脉分叉且有脑缺血症状的患者接受了3D MR DSA检查。在注射钆双胺造影剂后,用3D MR DSA生成时间分辨序列。颈动脉检查的分辨率为0.4×0.4×1.0毫米,以4.5秒的间隔重建容积。将3D MR DSA图像与同期采集的未增强2D及三维TOF图像进行比较。两名观察者根据以下方面对2D和3D TOF MR血管造影图像及3D MR DSA图像进行排序:(a)狭窄描绘,(b)颈内动脉描绘,(c)血管内信号强度,以及(d)诊断可信度。
3D MR DSA的诊断可信度平均排序为1.10(1 = 最佳技术,3 = 最差技术)。与2D TOF和3D TOF的综合排序相比,3D MR DSA的排序明显更好(P < .01)。在其他标准方面也发现了类似的统计学显著性水平。
三维MR DSA通过几乎消除饱和效应和减少体素内失相,改善了颈动脉狭窄的描绘。表面形态和几乎闭塞的血管(“线样征”)易于识别。使用该技术对识别颈动脉闭塞的信心也非常高。