Lundström M, Stenevi U, Thorburn W, Roos P
Department of Ophthalmology, Blekinge Hospital, Karlskrona, Sweden.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Jul;24(7):968-74. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80053-9.
To demonstrate the outcome for patients after cataract extraction using the Catquest cataract questionnaire and discuss the models validity in assessing outcome.
Thirty-five Swedish departments of ophthalmology.
Patients having cataract extraction performed by surgeons from 35 Swedish departments of opthalmology participated in the study. The questionnaire was given to 2970 consecutive patients having surgery during March 1995 at the participating surgical units. The questionnaire was sent by mail to patients and completed on a voluntary basis. It focuses on visual disabilities in daily life, activity level, cataract symptoms, and degree of independence. The results form the questionnaire are interpreted using a benefit matrix that credits not only a decrease in visual disabilities and cataract symptoms but also an improvement in or maintenance of a preoperative activity level.
Complete surgical outcome data and completed preoperative and postoperative questionnaires were available in 1933 cases (65.1%). Benefit from surgery according to the model was achieved by 90.9% of the patients. Patients having their second cataract extraction had the highest frequency of the greatest benefit form surgery. There was good agreement between the different levels of benefit from surgery according to the model and the patient's global rating of his or her vision or achieved visual acuity after surgery, respectively. Patients with missing data (did not return postoperative questionnaire or had missing surgical result variables) were older and had a higher frequency of other diseases and handicaps.
The Catquest cataract questionnaire allowed the outcome of cataract surgery to be graded by different levels of benefit. There seemed to be good agreement between this model of assessment and the patient's global rating of his or her vision. Missing data may be a problem when a postal questionnaire is used.
使用Catquest白内障问卷展示白内障摘除术后患者的结果,并讨论该模型在评估结果方面的有效性。
35个瑞典眼科科室。
由瑞典35个眼科科室的外科医生进行白内障摘除手术的患者参与了该研究。问卷被分发给1995年3月在参与手术的单位连续接受手术的2970名患者。问卷通过邮件发送给患者,由患者自愿填写。它关注日常生活中的视力残疾、活动水平、白内障症状和独立程度。问卷结果使用效益矩阵进行解读,该矩阵不仅考虑视力残疾和白内障症状的减轻,还考虑术前活动水平的改善或维持。
1933例(65.1%)患者有完整的手术结果数据以及术前和术后问卷。根据该模型,90.9%的患者从手术中获益。接受第二次白内障摘除手术的患者从手术中获得最大益处的频率最高。根据该模型手术获益的不同水平与患者对其术后视力或实际视力的总体评价之间分别具有良好的一致性。数据缺失的患者(未返回术后问卷或手术结果变量缺失)年龄较大,患有其他疾病和残疾的频率较高。
Catquest白内障问卷能够根据不同的获益水平对白内障手术结果进行分级。这种评估模型与患者对其视力的总体评价之间似乎具有良好的一致性。使用邮寄问卷时,数据缺失可能是一个问题。