Ros L, Mota J, Guedea A, Bidgood D
Departamento de Radiología, Hospital Miguel Servet, E-50009 Zaragora, Spain.
Eur Radiol. 1998;8(6):966-70. doi: 10.1007/s003300050497.
There is a large individual variation in human spinal cord and canal size, even in patients of different series studied by the same modality, and no authorized standard method has been established. A comparative study of sagittal diameters of the cervical spinal cord and canal using myelography and MRI is presented. The purposes of this paper are (a) to establish the correction factor (CF) needed for quantitative comparison of the two imaging modalities, and (b) to determine the different factors that may modify the measurement of these diameters. We studied 45 patients with clinical findings compatible with cervical spondilotic myelopathy. In our experience, the CF for accurate correlation of MRI and myelography measurements is 1.32 and depends almost entirely on the radiographic geometry of the myelographic procedure. In addition, there is a variability in the group of MRI results due to imprecision of the pressure-pad measuring/input device of the instrument itself and the sequence performed.
人类脊髓和椎管尺寸存在很大的个体差异,即使是同一研究方式下不同组别的患者也是如此,且尚未建立权威的标准方法。本文展示了一项使用脊髓造影和磁共振成像(MRI)对颈段脊髓和椎管矢状径进行的对比研究。本文目的在于:(a)确定两种成像方式进行定量比较所需的校正因子(CF);(b)确定可能影响这些直径测量结果的不同因素。我们研究了45例临床表现符合颈椎病性脊髓病的患者。根据我们的经验,MRI和脊髓造影测量结果准确关联所需的CF为1.32,且几乎完全取决于脊髓造影检查的放射几何学。此外,由于仪器本身压力垫测量/输入设备以及所执行序列的不精确性,MRI结果组中存在变异性。