Fournier G, Potier J, Thébaud H E, Majdalani G, Ton-That H, Man N K
Association des Insuffisants Rénaux de la région Beauce et Perche, Chartres, France.
Artif Organs. 1998 Jul;22(7):608-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.1998.06205.x.
In a multicenter study including 5 dialysis units, blood acetate changes during 4 h dialysis sessions in 141 patients treated with a 4 mM acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate (ABD) were evaluated and compared to the values of 114 patients using an acetate-free bicarbonate dialysate (AFD). Acetate-free bicarbonate dialysate was delivered by a dialysis machine from the mixing with water for dialysis of a 1/26.2 bicarbonate concentrate, and a 1/35 acid-concentrate in which acetic acid was substituted for hydrochloric acid (Soludia, Fourquevaux, France). This new type of dialysate was routinely in use for 3 years on average (range, from 2 to 5 years). All patients fasted before and during dialysis. Blood samples were withdrawn at the start and at the end of dialysis sessions. The acetate plasma concentration was determined using the acetyl-CoA synthetase enzymatic method (Boehringer, Manheim, Germany). In patients treated with ABD whose predialysis blood acetate levels were in the physiologic range of < or = 100 microM (n = 113), the acetate plasma concentration increased from a predialysis mean value of 22+/-3 microM to a postdialysis mean value of 222+/-11 microM in 88 patients (78% of patients) whereas the acetate plasma concentration changes remained in the range of physiologic values from 21+/-6 to 58+/-7 microM in the other 25 patients. In contrast, patients treated with AFD whose predialysis blood acetate levels were in the physiologic range (n = 108), acetate plasma concentration increased from a predialysis mean value of 49+/-6 microM to 160+/-19 microM in only 13 patients (12% of patients) whereas acetate plasma concentration changes remained in the range of physiologic values of 23+/-2 to 41+/-3 microM in most of the patients of this group. In this study, a significant number of patients, whether receiving standard or acetate-free bicarbonate dialysates, exhibited an extremely high acetate plasma concentration at the start of the dialysis session. Hyperacetatemia was controlled with AFD in patients whose predialysis acetate plasma concentration of 316+/-82 decreased to 55 +/-23 microM (n = 6) at the end of the dialysis session whereas the acetate plasma concentration remained high when the predialysis concentration was 580+/-76 microM, with a postdialysis concentration of 233+/-39 microM (n = 28). It is concluded that in patients whose predialysis blood acetate levels were in the physiologic range, acetate-containing bicarbonate dialysate induces hyperacetatemia whereas postdialysis blood acetate remains in the normal range in such dialysis patients treated with acetate-free dialysate. Chronic hyperacetatemia, which could be found in dialysis patients, is well controlled by dialysis using an acetate-free dialysate.
在一项纳入5个透析单元的多中心研究中,对141例使用含4 mM醋酸盐的碳酸氢盐透析液(ABD)进行4小时透析治疗的患者在透析过程中的血液醋酸盐变化进行了评估,并与114例使用无醋酸盐碳酸氢盐透析液(AFD)的患者的值进行了比较。无醋酸盐碳酸氢盐透析液由透析机通过将1/26.2的碳酸氢盐浓缩液与用于透析的水混合,并将1/35的酸浓缩液(其中用醋酸代替盐酸)(法国Fourquevaux的Soludia公司生产)输送。这种新型透析液平均常规使用3年(范围为2至5年)。所有患者在透析前和透析期间均禁食。在透析开始时和结束时采集血样。使用乙酰辅酶A合成酶酶法(德国曼海姆的勃林格公司)测定血浆醋酸盐浓度。在透析前血液醋酸盐水平处于生理范围(≤100 μM)的使用ABD治疗的患者中(n = 113),88例患者(占患者的78%)的血浆醋酸盐浓度从透析前的平均值22±3 μM增加到透析后的平均值222±11 μM,而另外25例患者的血浆醋酸盐浓度变化仍处于21±6至58±7 μM的生理值范围内。相比之下,透析前血液醋酸盐水平处于生理范围的使用AFD治疗的患者(n = 108),只有13例患者(占患者的12%)的血浆醋酸盐浓度从透析前的平均值49±6 μM增加到160±19 μM,而该组大多数患者的血浆醋酸盐浓度变化仍处于23±2至41±3 μM的生理值范围内。在本研究中,相当数量的患者,无论接受标准透析液还是无醋酸盐透析液,在透析开始时都表现出极高的血浆醋酸盐浓度。对于透析前血浆醋酸盐浓度为316±82 μM的患者,使用AFD可将其透析结束时的浓度降至55±23 μM(n = 6),而当透析前浓度为580±76 μM时,透析后浓度为233±39 μM(n = 28),血浆醋酸盐浓度仍保持较高水平。得出的结论是,对于透析前血液醋酸盐水平处于生理范围的患者,含醋酸盐的碳酸氢盐透析液会诱发高醋酸血症,而使用无醋酸盐透析液治疗的此类透析患者透析后血液醋酸盐仍处于正常范围内。透析患者中可能出现的慢性高醋酸血症可通过使用无醋酸盐透析液进行透析得到良好控制。