• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国退伍军人事务部康复机构中风康复结果的差异:病例组合分析

Stroke rehabilitation outcome variation in Veterans Affairs rehabilitation units: accounting for case-mix.

作者信息

Reker D M, O'Donnell J C, Hamilton B B

机构信息

Epidemiology Research and Information Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27705, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Jul;79(7):751-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90351-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90351-3
PMID:9685086
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess variation in stroke outcomes and create a case-mix adjustment model for stroke rehabilitation in Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.

DESIGN

Observational

SETTING AND PATIENTS

Within Veteran's Health Administration hospitals, there are 63 acute rehabilitation bedservice units that care for approximately 2,000 stroke patients annually.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Functional gain in FIM points, length of stay (LOS), LOS efficiency (FIM gain/LOS).

RESULTS

Significant variation in average patient functional gain, LOS, and LOS efficiency was observed among the 37 highest-volume rehabilitation units. Using analysis of covariance, a model was developed that adjusted functional gain and LOS (logged LOS) unit means using 10 potential covariates identified in a literature review and in pilot studies. Four and six covariates, respectively, were retained in the final models for FIM gain and LOS. The R2 for FIM gain and LOS accounted for by rehabilitation unit alone increased from .07 to .31 (FIM gain) and from .13 to .34 (logLOS) with the addition of the significant covariates to each model.

CONCLUSIONS

As much as 24% of the variation in two important stroke rehabilitation outcomes is attributable to largely immutable patient and system characteristics (eg, patient function on admission, age, days since stroke onset, year of discharge, marital status, and referral source). Hence, controlling for case-mix is critical for accurate comparison of unit outcomes. Further, the variation in LOS efficiency between VA rehabilitation units suggests a large potential for cost and resource utilization savings system-wide.

摘要

目的

评估退伍军人事务医疗中心中风康复结局的差异,并创建一个中风康复的病例组合调整模型。

设计

观察性研究

设置与患者

在退伍军人健康管理局的医院内,有63个急性康复病床服务单元,每年照料约2000名中风患者。

主要结局指标

功能独立性测量(FIM)得分的功能改善、住院时间(LOS)、住院时间效率(FIM改善/LOS)。

结果

在37个最高流量的康复单元中,观察到患者平均功能改善、住院时间和住院时间效率存在显著差异。使用协方差分析,开发了一个模型,该模型使用在文献综述和试点研究中确定的10个潜在协变量来调整功能改善和住院时间(对数住院时间)的单元均值。最终的FIM改善模型和住院时间模型分别保留了4个和6个协变量。随着每个模型中加入显著协变量,仅由康复单元解释的FIM改善和住院时间的R2分别从0.07增加到0.31(FIM改善)和从0.13增加到0.34(对数住院时间)。

结论

在两个重要的中风康复结局中,高达24%的差异主要归因于患者和系统的不可改变特征(例如,入院时的患者功能、年龄、中风发作后的天数、出院年份、婚姻状况和转诊来源)。因此,控制病例组合对于准确比较单元结局至关重要。此外,退伍军人事务部康复单元之间住院时间效率的差异表明,在全系统范围内节省成本和资源利用方面有很大潜力。

相似文献

1
Stroke rehabilitation outcome variation in Veterans Affairs rehabilitation units: accounting for case-mix.美国退伍军人事务部康复机构中风康复结果的差异:病例组合分析
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Jul;79(7):751-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90351-3.
2
Stroke rehabilitation management in the Department of Veterans Affairs: impact of patient referral source on outcomes.美国退伍军人事务部的中风康复管理:患者转诊来源对治疗结果的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Sep;78(9):929-37. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90052-6.
3
Inpatient rehabilitation after stroke: a comparison of lengths of stay and outcomes in the Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs health care system.中风后的住院康复治疗:退伍军人事务部与非退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统住院时间和治疗结果的比较。
Med Care. 2001 Feb;39(2):123-37. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200102000-00003.
4
Racial/ethnic differences in FIM scores and length of stay for underinsured patients undergoing stroke inpatient rehabilitation.未参保卒中住院康复患者功能独立性测量(FIM)评分及住院时间的种族/民族差异。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 May;85(5):415-23. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000214320.99729.f3.
5
Outcome indicators for stroke: application of an algorithm treatment across the continuum of postacute rehabilitation services.中风的结局指标:一种算法治疗在急性后期康复服务连续过程中的应用
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Nov;81(11):1468-78. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.17808.
6
Inpatient stroke rehabilitation lengths of stay in Canada derived from the National Rehabilitation Reporting System, 2008 and 2009.2008 年和 2009 年加拿大国家康复报告系统中的住院脑卒中康复治疗时间。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;95(1):74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
7
Functional measures of first-stroke rehabilitation inpatients: usefulness of the Functional Independence Measure total score with a clinical rationale.首次中风康复住院患者的功能评估:功能独立性测量总分的实用性及临床依据
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Jun;78(6):630-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90429-9.
8
Outcomes from stroke rehabilitation in Veterans Affairs rehabilitation units: detecting and correcting for selection bias.退伍军人事务部康复单位中风康复的结果:检测并纠正选择偏倚。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002 May-Jun;39(3):367-83.
9
Functional outcome of hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic stroke patients after in-patient rehabilitation.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 May-Jun;75(3):177-82. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199605000-00004.
10
Nursing home rehabilitation after acute rehabilitation: predictors and outcomes.急性康复后的疗养院康复:预测因素与结果
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Jun;79(6):670-3. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90042-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Postacute Care Setting, Facility Characteristics, and Poststroke Outcomes: A Systematic Review.急性后期护理环境、设施特点与脑卒中后结局:系统评价。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jun;99(6):1124-1140.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
2
Association between mental health conditions and rehospitalization, mortality, and functional outcomes in patients with stroke following inpatient rehabilitation.住院康复后脑卒中患者的心理健康状况与再住院、死亡率和功能结局的关系。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Nov 15;11:311. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-311.
3
Agreement of patient and physician ratings on mobility and self-care in neurological diseases.
患者和医生对神经疾病患者活动能力和自理能力的评估一致性。
Qual Life Res. 2009 Oct;18(8):999-1010. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9520-0. Epub 2009 Aug 4.