• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些结肠息肉应该在内镜下切除?

Which colonic polyps should be excised endoscopically?

作者信息

Christie J P

出版信息

South Med J. 1976 Sep;69(9):1143-5. doi: 10.1097/00007611-197609000-00012.

DOI:10.1097/00007611-197609000-00012
PMID:968529
Abstract

A review of 464 consecutive polypoid lesions of the colon reveals that virtually all pedunculated polyps and over 80% of 218 sessile polyps were removed colonoscopically. Although size or location of the lesions occasionally precludes colonoscopic excision, the endoscopic appearance of a sessile polyp is the most important factor in deciding upon the method of excision. In gneeral, smooth, soft, nonulcerated sessile lesions of all sizes were excised endoscopically, while approximately half of the larger (2-6 cm) firm, irregular-surfaced, benign sessile lesions, and all ulcerated or malignant sessile lesions required laparotomy for proper management. All polypoid lesions should be viewed endoscopically before deciding the method of excision, regardless of their size, location, or general appearnce by barium enema. Experience with endoscopic morphology and snare electrocautery technics was most important, since more than 85% of all polypoid lesions in this consecutive series were removed endoscopically.

摘要

对464例连续性结肠息肉样病变的回顾显示,几乎所有带蒂息肉以及218例无蒂息肉中的80%以上都是通过结肠镜切除的。尽管病变的大小或位置偶尔会妨碍结肠镜切除,但无蒂息肉的内镜表现是决定切除方法的最重要因素。一般来说,各种大小的光滑、柔软、无溃疡的无蒂病变都通过内镜切除,而大约一半较大(2 - 6厘米)、质地坚硬、表面不规则的良性无蒂病变以及所有溃疡或恶性无蒂病变需要开腹手术以进行妥善处理。在决定切除方法之前,所有息肉样病变都应进行内镜检查,无论其大小、位置或钡剂灌肠的总体表现如何。内镜形态学和圈套电灼技术的经验最为重要,因为在这一连续性系列中,超过85%的息肉样病变是通过内镜切除的。

相似文献

1
Which colonic polyps should be excised endoscopically?哪些结肠息肉应该在内镜下切除?
South Med J. 1976 Sep;69(9):1143-5. doi: 10.1097/00007611-197609000-00012.
2
Colonscopic excision of sessile polyps.广基息肉的结肠镜切除
Am J Gastroenterol. 1976 Jul;66(1):23-8.
3
Malignant colon polyps--cure by colonoscopy or colectomy?恶性结肠息肉——通过结肠镜检查还是结肠切除术治愈?
Am J Gastroenterol. 1984 Jul;79(7):543-7.
4
Technique of colonoscopic polypectomy.结肠镜息肉切除术技术
Surg Clin North Am. 1982 Oct;62(5):877-87. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)42838-0.
5
Does Cancer Risk in Colonic Polyps Unsuitable for Polypectomy Support the Need for Advanced Endoscopic Resections?不适合息肉切除术的结肠息肉的癌症风险是否支持进行高级内镜切除术的必要性?
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Sep;223(3):478-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.05.018. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
6
Colonoscopic excision of large and giant colorectal polyps. Technical implications and results over eight years.大肠大息肉和巨大息肉的结肠镜切除:技术要点及八年治疗结果
Dis Colon Rectum. 1986 Dec;29(12):831-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02555357.
7
Colonoscopic excision of large sessile polyps.大肠镜下切除大型无蒂息肉。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1977 May;67(5):430-8.
8
Management of sessile malignant polyps: is colonoscopic polypectomy enough?无蒂恶性息肉的处理:结肠镜下息肉切除术是否足够?
Surg Endosc. 2015 Oct;29(10):2947-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4027-3. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
9
Polypectomy or colectomy? Management of 106 consecutively encountered colorectal polyps.息肉切除术还是结肠切除术?106例连续遇到的大肠息肉的处理
Am Surg. 1988 Feb;54(2):93-9.
10
Malignancy of colonic polyps. Diagnosis and management.结肠息肉恶变。诊断与管理。
Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1978;19(3):479-95. doi: 10.1177/028418517801900309.

引用本文的文献

1
Experience with 1000 colonoscopic polypectomies.1000例结肠镜息肉切除术的经验
Ann Surg. 1985 May;201(5):626-32. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198505000-00012.