• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声激活手术刀会释放有活力的空气传播癌细胞吗?

Does the ultrasonically activated scalpel release viable airborne cancer cells?

作者信息

Nduka C C, Poland N, Kennedy M, Dye J, Darzi A

机构信息

Academic Surgical Unit, Imperial College School of Medicine at Saint Mary's, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 1998 Aug;12(8):1031-4. doi: 10.1007/s004649900774.

DOI:10.1007/s004649900774
PMID:9685536
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Viable cancer cells may implant at distant sites and cause tumor recurrence. One possible mechanism is the inadvertent exfoliation of viable tumor cells during dissection. The ultrasonically activated scalpel (UAS) uses ultrasonic energy to disrupt tissues by cavitation and produces a dense cloud of cellular debris that may contain viable cells. This study aimed to investigate the viability of airborne cells released during cancer dissection using the UAS and electrosurgery.

METHODS

Flank tumors (n = 8) measuring 1 cm3 were induced in male WAG rats by subcutaneous injection of 2 x 10(6) CC531s colon cancer cells. Dissection was performed in cutting mode using the maximum power output of the respective devices. Electrosurgery was performed using a standard monopolar electrosurgical unit and a needle probe, and ultrasonic dissection was performed with the Harmonic Scalpel utilising the open surgical handset and the hooked spatula tip. The smoke plume was aspirated by a vacuum pump and bubbled under Hank's balanced salt solution to trap particulate matter. The viability of the cellular material was blindly assessed with the trypan blue test and by in vitro culture. The morphology of the cellular debris was studied by examination of cytospin preparations.

RESULTS

Large quantities of cellular debris was trapped in the plume from both devices. However, no viable cells were isolated, nor did in vitro cell growth occur with either device. Examination of the debris from the UAS demonstrated a characteristic mixture of amorphous forms and very few morphologically intact cells. The cauterized tumor produced charred cells and tissue fragments.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that viable airborne cancer cells are not released after tumor ablation with the UAS or electrosurgery.

摘要

背景

存活的癌细胞可能会在远处着床并导致肿瘤复发。一种可能的机制是在解剖过程中存活的肿瘤细胞意外脱落。超声手术刀(UAS)利用超声能量通过空化作用破坏组织,并产生一团可能含有活细胞的密集细胞碎片云。本研究旨在调查使用UAS和电外科手术进行癌症解剖时释放的空气中细胞的活力。

方法

通过皮下注射2×10⁶个CC531s结肠癌细胞,在雄性WAG大鼠中诱导出体积为1 cm³的侧腹肿瘤(n = 8)。使用各自设备的最大功率输出,以切割模式进行解剖。使用标准单极电外科设备和针状探头进行电外科手术,使用超声手术刀(Harmonic Scalpel)并配备开放式手术手柄和钩状刮铲尖端进行超声解剖。用真空泵抽吸烟雾,并使其在汉克平衡盐溶液下鼓泡以捕获颗粒物。通过台盼蓝试验和体外培养盲目评估细胞材料的活力。通过检查细胞涂片制剂研究细胞碎片的形态。

结果

两种设备产生的烟雾中都捕获了大量细胞碎片。然而,未分离出活细胞,两种设备也均未出现体外细胞生长。对UAS产生的碎片进行检查发现,其呈现出无定形形式的特征性混合物,且形态完整的细胞极少。烧灼的肿瘤产生了烧焦的细胞和组织碎片。

结论

总之,本研究表明,使用UAS或电外科手术进行肿瘤切除后,不会释放存活的空气中癌细胞。

相似文献

1
Does the ultrasonically activated scalpel release viable airborne cancer cells?超声激活手术刀会释放有活力的空气传播癌细胞吗?
Surg Endosc. 1998 Aug;12(8):1031-4. doi: 10.1007/s004649900774.
2
Viability of Airborne Tumor Cells during Excision by Ultrasonic Device.超声设备切除过程中空气传播肿瘤细胞的生存能力。
Surg Res Pract. 2017;2017:4907576. doi: 10.1155/2017/4907576. Epub 2017 Apr 9.
3
Postoperative adhesion formation in a rabbit model: monopolar electrosurgery versus ultrasonic scalpel.兔模型中术后粘连形成:单极电刀与超声刀的比较
JSLS. 2015 Apr-Jun;19(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00018.
4
Comparison of experimental nerve injury caused by ultrasonically activated scalpel and electrosurgery.超声刀与电刀所致实验性神经损伤的比较
Br J Surg. 2005 Jun;92(6):772-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4948.
5
Experimental study of the potential hazards of surgical smoke from powered instruments.动力器械手术烟雾潜在危害的实验研究。
Br J Surg. 2015 Nov;102(12):1581-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9910. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
6
[Experimental study of monopolar electrical and ultrasonic dissection].[单极电切与超声刀切割的实验研究]
Ann Chir. 2001 May;126(4):330-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3944(01)00515-6.
7
Energy sources for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomized comparison of conventional electrosurgery, bipolar computer-controlled electrosurgery and ultrasonic dissection. Operative outcome and costs analysis.腹腔镜结肠切除术的能量来源:传统电外科、双极计算机控制电外科与超声解剖的前瞻性随机比较。手术结果及成本分析。
Surg Innov. 2005 Dec;12(4):339-44. doi: 10.1177/155335060501200409.
8
Effects of steel scalpel, ultrasonic scalpel, CO2 laser, and monopolar and bipolar electrosurgery on wound healing in guinea pig oral mucosa.钢刀、超声刀、二氧化碳激光以及单极和双极电刀对豚鼠口腔黏膜伤口愈合的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2003 Feb;113(2):228-36. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200302000-00007.
9
A randomized phase II study of the clinical effects of ultrasonically activated coagulating shears (Harmonic scalpel) in open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.超声激活凝血剪(超声刀)在胃癌开腹胃切除术中临床效果的随机II期研究
Surg Today. 2016 May;46(5):561-8. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1213-4. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
10
Comparison of Surgical Smoke Generated During Electrosurgery with Aerosolized Particulates from Ultrasonic and High-Speed Cutting.比较电外科手术与超声和高速切割产生的气溶胶颗粒的手术烟雾。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2021 Feb;49(2):560-572. doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02587-w. Epub 2020 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative Analysis of Small Particles Present in Surgical Smoke Generated During Breast Surgery.乳腺手术中产生的手术烟雾中小颗粒的定量分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Aug 7;61(8):1422. doi: 10.3390/medicina61081422.
2
Detection of human coronavirus RNA in surgical smoke generated by surgical devices.检测手术设备产生的手术烟雾中的人类冠状病毒 RNA。
J Hosp Infect. 2021 Nov;117:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.08.022. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
3
Comparison of Surgical Smoke Generated During Electrosurgery with Aerosolized Particulates from Ultrasonic and High-Speed Cutting.
比较电外科手术与超声和高速切割产生的气溶胶颗粒的手术烟雾。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2021 Feb;49(2):560-572. doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02587-w. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
4
The risk of COVID-19 transmission by laparoscopic smoke may be lower than for laparotomy: a narrative review.腹腔镜烟雾传播 COVID-19 的风险可能低于剖腹手术:叙述性综述。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3298-3305. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07652-y. Epub 2020 May 26.
5
Is the ultrasonic scalpel recommended in head and neck surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic? State-of-the-art review.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,头颈部手术中推荐使用超声刀吗?最新综述。
Head Neck. 2020 Jul;42(7):1657-1663. doi: 10.1002/hed.26278. Epub 2020 May 22.
6
Lateral thermal spread induced by energy devices: a porcine model to evaluate the influence on the recurrent laryngeal nerve.能量设备引起的侧向热扩散:一种评估对喉返神经影响的猪模型。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):4153-4163. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06724-y. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
7
Oncological safety of use of ultrasonic activated shears in gastric cancer surgery: Long-term results of randomized controlled trial.超声刀在胃癌手术中应用的肿瘤学安全性:随机对照试验的长期结果
Chin J Cancer Res. 2018 Oct;30(5):492-499. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.05.02.
8
In vitro toxicological evaluation of surgical smoke from human tissue.人体组织手术烟雾的体外毒理学评估
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2018 Apr 2;13:12. doi: 10.1186/s12995-018-0193-x. eCollection 2018.
9
Viability of Airborne Tumor Cells during Excision by Ultrasonic Device.超声设备切除过程中空气传播肿瘤细胞的生存能力。
Surg Res Pract. 2017;2017:4907576. doi: 10.1155/2017/4907576. Epub 2017 Apr 9.
10
Experimental analyses of the cavitation generated by ultrasonically activated surgical devices.超声激活手术器械产生空化效应的实验分析。
Surg Today. 2017 Jan;47(1):122-129. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1345-1. Epub 2016 May 6.