Afouna M I, Mehta S C, Ghanem A H, Higuchi W I, Kern E R, De Clercq E, El-Shattawy H H
Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Utah, 30 So. 2000 E, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.
J Pharm Sci. 1998 Aug;87(8):917-21. doi: 10.1021/js980052a.
Recently, we reported that the in vivo efficacy of acyclovir (ACV) formulations was a single valued function of skin target site free drug concentration (C) irrespective of the formulation compositions. A long-term objective of this research has been to generalize the C concept using model drugs which are similar to as well as different from ACV in their mechanism of actions. (Bromovinyl)deoxyuridine (BVDU) was selected as a model drug based on the reported similarity in its mechanism of action with ACV. The relationship between the C predictions and the in vivo efficacies for some topical formulations containing different concentrations (0.05-10%) of either ACV or BVDU in 95% DMSO as a vehicle with or without 5% Azone as skin permeation enhancer was examined. Hairless mice infected cutaneously with HSV-1 were used to quantitatively estimate the in vivo topical antiviral efficacy. A finite dose of the test antiviral formulation was applied twice a day for 4 days, starting the day after virus inoculation. On the fifth day, the lesions were scored and the efficacy values were calculated. For each formulation, in vitro flux experiments were performed in an in vivo-in vitro experimental design that closely approximated the in vivo study protocol. As was previously shown, with all ACV formulations, a good correlation was found between the C predictions and the in vivo topical efficacy. With the BVDU formulations, on the other hand, this was found not to be the case. BVDU formulations with 5% Azone were generally much more effective than those without Azone at comparable C values. This finding is believed to be the first of its kind showing that skin "permeation enhancers" may enhance efficacy by more than simply increasing skin permeation rates.
最近,我们报道了阿昔洛韦(ACV)制剂的体内疗效是皮肤靶位点游离药物浓度(C)的单一值函数,与制剂组成无关。本研究的一个长期目标是使用在作用机制上与ACV相似和不同的模型药物来推广C概念。基于报道的其与ACV作用机制的相似性,选择了(溴乙烯基)脱氧尿苷(BVDU)作为模型药物。研究了一些含有不同浓度(0.05 - 10%)ACV或BVDU的局部制剂在95%二甲基亚砜作为载体、有或没有5%氮酮作为皮肤渗透促进剂的情况下,C预测值与体内疗效之间的关系。用经皮肤感染单纯疱疹病毒1型的无毛小鼠定量评估体内局部抗病毒疗效。从病毒接种后的第二天开始,每天两次给予有限剂量的测试抗病毒制剂,持续4天。在第五天,对病变进行评分并计算疗效值。对于每种制剂,在一个与体内研究方案非常接近的体内 - 体外实验设计中进行体外通量实验。如先前所示,对于所有ACV制剂,在C预测值与体内局部疗效之间发现了良好的相关性。另一方面,对于BVDU制剂,情况并非如此。在相当的C值下,含有5%氮酮的BVDU制剂通常比不含氮酮的制剂有效得多。这一发现被认为是同类研究中的首例,表明皮肤“渗透促进剂”可能不仅仅通过简单提高皮肤渗透率来增强疗效。