Suppr超能文献

自由放养的大角羊中蓝舌病病毒诊断检测的评估

Evaluation of bluetongue virus diagnostic tests in free-ranging bighorn sheep.

作者信息

Singer R S, Boyce W M, Gardner I A, Johnson W O, Fisher A S

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616, USA.

出版信息

Prev Vet Med. 1998 Jun 30;35(4):265-82. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(98)00067-1.

Abstract

Five bluetongue virus (BTV) diagnostic tests were evaluated for use in free-ranging bighorn sheep. We sampled one bighorn sheep population four times between 1989 and 1995. The tests evaluated included virus isolation (VI), polymerase-chain reaction (PCR), serum neutralization (SN), agar-gel immunodiffusion (AGID), and competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (c-ELISA). The c-ELISA, AGID and SN tests had high levels of agreement in determining serogroup exposure in bighorn sheep. We used maximum-likelihood algorithms to estimate the parameters of each diagnostic test used. Although the c-ELISA and AGID had high sensitivity and specificity, the SN had perfect specificity but lower apparent sensitivity. Due to the potential of cross-reactions among multiple serotypes, results of the SN must be interpreted with caution when assessing serotype exposure in an area where multiple serotypes are endemic. The PCR assay delineated convalescent antibody titers from more-recent infections, and consequently, was pivotal in distinguishing a different exposure pattern between the bighorn sheep and cattle in an adjacent herd. Based on an increasing seroprevalence (50% to 100%), BTV circulated through this bighorn sheep population between 1989 and 1993. This increase in seroprevalence coincided with a bighorn die-off due to BTV infection in June, 1991. An adjacent cattle herd was sampled in 1995 for comparison. The bighorn sheep and adjacent cattle had different patterns of exposure to BTV between 1994 and 1995. There was no evidence that BTV circulated through the bighorn sheep population from 1994 to 1995. In 1995, seroprevalence to BTV decreased to 72%, none of yearling bighorn was seropositive, and all of the 39 bighorn sheep were PCR-negative. In contrast, all adult cattle were seropositive to BTV by c-ELISA and SN, and 4 of the calves were seropositive; 11 of the 24 cattle were PCR-positive, including all five calves. Overall, the pattern of temporal herd immunity in the bighorn sheep appeared to follow a classic epidemic curve, with the appearance and subsequent disappearance of herd immunity coinciding with the 1991 die-off in this population. As low levels of herd immunity and high proportions of susceptible animals are key factors in the development of epidemics, this population of bighorn sheep may be at increased risk for a BTV epidemic in the future.

摘要

对五种蓝舌病病毒(BTV)诊断检测方法在自由放养的大角羊中的应用进行了评估。1989年至1995年间,我们对一个大角羊种群进行了四次采样。所评估的检测方法包括病毒分离(VI)、聚合酶链反应(PCR)、血清中和试验(SN)、琼脂凝胶免疫扩散试验(AGID)和竞争酶联免疫吸附测定(c-ELISA)。c-ELISA、AGID和SN检测方法在确定大角羊血清群暴露方面具有高度一致性。我们使用最大似然算法来估计所使用的每种诊断检测方法的参数。尽管c-ELISA和AGID具有高灵敏度和特异性,但SN具有完美的特异性但表观灵敏度较低。由于多种血清型之间存在交叉反应的可能性,在评估多种血清型流行地区的血清型暴露时,SN的结果必须谨慎解释。PCR检测方法能够区分近期感染产生的恢复期抗体滴度,因此,在区分相邻畜群中大角羊和牛不同的暴露模式方面至关重要。基于血清阳性率的上升(从50%到100%),BTV在1989年至1993年间在这个大角羊种群中传播。血清阳性率的这种上升与1991年6月因BTV感染导致的大角羊死亡同时发生。1995年对相邻的牛群进行了采样以作比较。1994年至1995年间,大角羊和相邻牛群对BTV的暴露模式不同。没有证据表明1994年至1995年间BTV在大角羊种群中传播。1995年,对BTV的血清阳性率降至72%,一岁大角羊均未呈血清阳性,39只大角羊的PCR检测均为阴性。相比之下,所有成年牛通过c-ELISA和SN检测对BTV均呈血清阳性,4头小牛呈血清阳性;24头牛中有11头PCR检测呈阳性,包括所有5头小牛。总体而言,大角羊群体的时间性群体免疫模式似乎遵循经典的流行曲线,群体免疫的出现和随后的消失与该种群1991年的死亡情况相符。由于低水平的群体免疫和高比例的易感动物是疫情发展的关键因素,这个大角羊种群未来可能面临更高的BTV疫情风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验