Suppr超能文献

2型糖尿病患者的胰岛素治疗应在门诊还是住院开始?一项前瞻性对照试验的结果,该试验在门诊护理和大学医院采用相同的治疗和教学方案。

Should insulin therapy in type 2 diabetic patients be started on an out- or inpatient basis? Results of a prospective controlled trial using the same treatment and teaching programme in ambulatory care and a university hospital.

作者信息

Müller U A, Müller R, Starrach A, Hunger-Dathe W, Schiel R, Jörgens V, Grüsser M

机构信息

Dept. of Internal Medicine II, Medical School, University of Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Diabetes Metab. 1998 Jun;24(3):251-5.

PMID:9690059
Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether Type 2 diabetic patients should be hospitalised to start insulin therapy. The same structured diabetes treatment and teaching programme (DTTP) was used in outpatients in 10 private practices after postgraduate training of physicians and teaching staff as well as in the Diabetes Department of the University Hospital of Jena, Germany. Seventy-two consecutive Type 2 diabetic patients (ambulatory group) participated in the outpatient DTTP. After one year, 70 patients were re-evaluated and compared with 70 other patients (matched pairs) who were referred to the University Hospital of Jena to start insulin treatment and participated in the same programme during hospitalisation. Initially there were no significant differences between the groups for age, gender, HbA1c, body mass index (BMI), and the time since diagnosis of diabetes. HbA1c (mean normal value 5%) decreased in both groups within the 12 months of follow-up (ambulatory group from 10.3 +/- 2.2 to 8.1 +/- 1.7, p < 0.0001; inpatient group from 10.4 +/- 1.6 to 8.4 +/- 1.7, P = 0.0001). At follow-up there were no significant differences between the groups concerning insulin dosage, HbA1c, severe hypoglycaemia, BMI, and hospitalisation. In combination with a DTTP, the initiation of insulin therapy on an ambulatory basis was as safe and effective as in the inpatient programme. Cost-benefit analysis demonstrated substantial savings in direct costs in the ambulatory programme.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定2型糖尿病患者是否应住院开始胰岛素治疗。在医生和教学人员接受研究生培训后,10家私人诊所的门诊患者以及德国耶拿大学医院糖尿病科采用了相同的结构化糖尿病治疗与教学方案(DTTP)。72例连续的2型糖尿病患者(门诊组)参加了门诊DTTP。一年后,对70例患者进行了重新评估,并与另外70例被转诊至耶拿大学医院开始胰岛素治疗并在住院期间参加相同方案的患者(配对组)进行了比较。最初,两组在年龄、性别、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、体重指数(BMI)以及糖尿病诊断后的时间方面没有显著差异。在12个月的随访期内,两组的HbA1c(平均正常值5%)均有所下降(门诊组从10.3±2.2降至8.1±1.7,p<0.0001;住院组从10.4±1.6降至8.4±1.7,P = 0.0001)。随访时,两组在胰岛素剂量、HbA1c、严重低血糖、BMI和住院情况方面没有显著差异。与DTTP相结合,门诊开始胰岛素治疗与住院治疗方案一样安全有效。成本效益分析表明,门诊方案在直接成本方面有大量节省。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验