Suppr超能文献

豚鼠窦房结和房室结中腺苷受体的药理学分类

Pharmacological classification of adenosine receptors in the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes of the guinea-pig.

作者信息

Meester B J, Shankley N P, Welsh N J, Wood J, Meijler F L, Black J W

机构信息

Analytical Pharmacology, Rayne Institute, King's College School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Pharmacol. 1998 Jun;124(4):685-92. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701891.

Abstract
  1. The effects of seven agonist and three antagonist adenosine receptor ligands were compared on the guinea-pig sinoatrial (SA) node (isolated right atrium) and atrioventricular (AV) node (perfused whole heart). Single agonist concentration-effect curves were obtained to 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA), R(-)-N6-(2-phenylisopropyl)adenosine (R-PIA), N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA), 2-chloroadenosine (CADO),),S(+)-N6-(2-phenylisopropyl)adenosine (L-PIA), 2-phenylaminoadenosine (CV 1808) and N6-aminoadenosine (MeAdo). Adenosine and/or NECA curves were obtained in the absence and presence of the antagonists 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), 9-chloro-2 (2-furanyl)-5,6-dihydro-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]quinazolin-5-imine (CGS15943) and N6-(endonorbornan-2-yl)-9-methyladenine (N-0861). 2. A formal comparison of the agonist and antagonist potency data was made by fitting the data to a straight line using a least squares procedure based on principal components analysis to account for the variance on both axes. The antagonist affinity estimates made on the two assays did not deviate significantly from the line of identity. 3. The agonist p[A]50 data obtained on the two assays did not deviate from the line of identity, indicating that there were no significant differences in potencies between the two assays. The p[A]50 ratio of R-PIA and S-PIA was 1.24+/-0.09 in the SA node and 1.36+/-0.11 in the AV node, indicating no difference in the stereoselectivity of the PIA isomers between the two tissues. 4. The agonist potency and antagonist affinity data obtained are consistent with previous findings showing that the AV and SA node data are pharmacologically indistinguishable and belong to the adenosine A1-receptor class. No evidence for the reported A3-receptor was found.
摘要
  1. 比较了七种激动剂和三种拮抗剂腺苷受体配体对豚鼠窦房结(SA 结,分离的右心房)和房室结(灌注的全心)的作用。获得了针对 5'-N-乙基羧酰胺腺苷(NECA)、R(-)-N6-(2-苯异丙基)腺苷(R-PIA)、N6-环己基腺苷(CHA)、2-氯腺苷(CADO)、S(+)-N6-(2-苯异丙基)腺苷(L-PIA)、2-苯氨基腺苷(CV 1808)和 N6-氨基腺苷(MeAdo)的单激动剂浓度-效应曲线。在不存在和存在拮抗剂 8-环戊基-1,3-二丙基黄嘌呤(DPCPX)、9-氯-2-(2-呋喃基)-5,6-二氢-1,2,4-三唑并[1,5-c]喹唑啉-5-亚胺(CGS15943)和 N6-(内型降冰片烷-2-基)-9-甲基腺嘌呤(N-0861)的情况下获得腺苷和/或 NECA 曲线。2. 通过使用基于主成分分析的最小二乘法程序将数据拟合到一条直线上来对激动剂和拮抗剂效价数据进行形式上的比较,以考虑两个轴上的数据差异。在两种测定中得出的拮抗剂亲和力估计值与恒等线没有显著偏差。3. 在两种测定中获得的激动剂 p[A]50 数据与恒等线没有偏差,表明两种测定之间的效价没有显著差异。R-PIA 和 S-PIA 的 p[A]50 比值在 SA 结中为 1.24±0.09,在房室结中为 1.36±0.11,表明两种组织中 PIA 异构体的立体选择性没有差异。4. 获得的激动剂效价和拮抗剂亲和力数据与先前的研究结果一致,表明房室结和窦房结的数据在药理学上无法区分,且属于腺苷 A1 受体类别。未发现有关报道的 A3 受体的证据。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiac purinergic signalling in health and disease.健康与疾病中的心脏嘌呤能信号传导
Purinergic Signal. 2015 Mar;11(1):1-46. doi: 10.1007/s11302-014-9436-1. Epub 2014 Dec 20.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验