Kaprielian R, Plyley M J, Klentrou P, Goodman L S, Goodman J M
The Toronto Hospital Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Charlie-Conacher Research Wing, Ontario, Canada.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998 Jul;78(2):141-7. doi: 10.1007/s004210050399.
Exercise intolerance in persons with paraplegia (PARAS) is thought to be secondary to insufficient venous return and a subnormal cardiac output at a given oxygen uptake. However, these issues have not been resolved fully. This study utilized lower-body positive pressure (LBPP) as an intervention during arm crank exercise in PARAS in order to examine this issue. Endurance-trained (TP, n = 7) and untrained PARAS (UP, n = 10) with complete lesions between T6 and T12, and a control group consisting of sedentary able-bodied subjects (SAB, n = 10) were tested. UP and TP subjects demonstrated a diminished cardiac output (via CO2 rebreathing) during exercise compared to SAB subjects. Peak oxygen uptake (O2peak) remained unchanged for all groups following LBPP. LBPP resulted in a significant decrease in heart rate (HR) in UP and TP (P < 0.05), but not SAB subjects. LBPP produced an insignificant increase in cardiac output (Q) and stroke volume (SV). The significant decrease in HR in both PARA groups may indicate a modest hemodynamic benefit of LBPP at higher work rates where circulatory sufficiency may be most compromised. We conclude that PARAS possess a diminished cardiac output during exercise compared to the able-bodied, and LBPP fails to ameliorate significantly their exercise response irrespective of the conditioning level. These results support previous observations of a lower cardiac output during exercise in PARAS, but indicate that lower-limb blood pooling may not be a primary limitation to arm exercise in paraplegia.
截瘫患者的运动不耐受被认为是由于静脉回流不足以及在给定摄氧量下心输出量低于正常水平所致。然而,这些问题尚未得到完全解决。本研究采用下体正压(LBPP)作为截瘫患者进行手臂曲柄运动时的一种干预措施,以研究这一问题。对7名耐力训练的截瘫患者(TP组)、10名未经训练的截瘫患者(UP组)进行了测试,这些患者的损伤平面均在T6至T12之间,同时还设置了一个由久坐不动的健全受试者组成的对照组(SAB组,n = 10)。与SAB组受试者相比,UP组和TP组受试者在运动过程中心输出量(通过二氧化碳重呼吸法测定)降低。下体正压干预后,所有组的峰值摄氧量(O2peak)均保持不变。下体正压使UP组和TP组受试者的心率(HR)显著降低(P < 0.05),但SAB组受试者的心率未降低。下体正压使心输出量(Q)和每搏输出量(SV)有不显著的增加。两个截瘫组心率的显著降低可能表明,在下体正压干预下,在较高工作强度下(此时循环充足性可能受到最大影响)存在适度的血流动力学益处。我们得出结论,与健全人相比,截瘫患者在运动过程中心输出量降低,并且无论身体状况如何,下体正压均不能显著改善他们的运动反应。这些结果支持了之前关于截瘫患者运动时心输出量较低的观察结果,但表明下肢血液淤积可能不是截瘫患者手臂运动的主要限制因素。