Wang S T, Pizzolato S, Demshar H P
Neonatal/Chemistry Lab, Ontario Ministry of Health, Etobicoke, Canada.
Clin Chim Acta. 1998 Jun 22;274(2):151-8. doi: 10.1016/s0009-8981(98)00057-6.
We used a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plot to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of primary thyrotropin (TSH) screening, and compared it to the primary thyroxine (T4) with secondary TSH screening (T4/TSH) on a certain percentage of the lowest T4 value for newborn congenital hypothyroidism (CH). There were 2198 normal and 117 abnormal CH cases evaluated using both the Wallac Delfia neonatal TSH and neonatal T4 kits. The ROC areas of the primary TSH screening and T4/TSH screening were 0.9841 and 0.9557, respectively. Nine cases (out of 117 cases) of CH would have been misclassified if T4/TSH screening were used. These nine cases, however, were identified using primary TSH screening. We conclude that using primary TSH screening is more effective for mass screening in reducing false-positive and false-negative cases than the combined T4/TSH screening method.
我们使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线来评估原发性促甲状腺激素(TSH)筛查的诊断准确性,并将其与在一定比例的新生儿先天性甲状腺功能减退症(CH)最低甲状腺素(T4)值基础上进行继发性TSH筛查的原发性甲状腺素(T4)(T4/TSH)进行比较。使用Wallac Delfia新生儿TSH试剂盒和新生儿T4试剂盒对2198例正常病例和117例CH异常病例进行了评估。原发性TSH筛查和T4/TSH筛查的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.9841和0.9557。如果使用T4/TSH筛查,117例CH病例中有9例会被误诊。然而,这9例病例通过原发性TSH筛查得以识别。我们得出结论,与联合T4/TSH筛查方法相比,使用原发性TSH筛查在大规模筛查中减少假阳性和假阴性病例方面更有效。