• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病新诊断标准会改变糖尿病患者的表型吗?欧洲流行病学数据的重新分析。DECODE研究组代表欧洲糖尿病流行病学研究组。

Will new diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus change phenotype of patients with diabetes? Reanalysis of European epidemiological data. DECODE Study Group on behalf of the European Diabetes Epidemiology Study Group.

出版信息

BMJ. 1998 Aug 8;317(7155):371-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7155.371.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.317.7155.371
PMID:9694750
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC28629/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of the revised diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus adopted by the American Diabetes Association on prevalence of diabetes and on classification of patients. For epidemiological purposes the American criteria use a fasting plasma glucose concentration >=7.0 mmol/l in contrast with the current World Health Organisation criteria of 2 hour glucose concentration >=11.1 mmol/l.

DESIGN

Data were collected from 13 populations and three occupational based studies from eight European countries. All studies used a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test to measure fasting and 2 hour glucose concentrations.

SUBJECTS

17 881 men; 8309 women; age range 17-92 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Classification of diabetes according to both sets of criteria.

RESULTS

The application of the American criteria on European populations induced changes in prevalence of diabetes ranging from a reduction of 4.0% to an increase of 13.2%. A total of 1517 previously undiagnosed individuals had diabetes according to either the WHO or the American criteria. Among 1044 with diabetes according to American criteria, only 45% had 2 hour values fulfilling the WHO criteria. The risk of disagreement of classification decreased with increasing body mass index (P<0.00001) and increasing age (P<0.0001); the impact of sex was not significant (P=0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

This shift in strategy from using 2 hour to fasting plasma glucose will cause an increase in the prevalence of diabetes in some European populations. A high degree of disagreement in the classification was observed between the two recommendations. Prospective data are needed to evaluate whether the WHO or the American criteria best identify individuals at risk of developing microvascular complications and cardiovascular disease. Wider implementation of revised diagnostic criteria should await prospective data.

摘要

目的

评估美国糖尿病协会采用的修订版糖尿病诊断标准对糖尿病患病率及患者分类的影响。出于流行病学目的,美国的标准采用空腹血糖浓度≥7.0 mmol/L,而目前世界卫生组织的标准是2小时血糖浓度≥11.1 mmol/L。

设计

数据收集自8个欧洲国家的13个人群和3项基于职业的研究。所有研究均采用75克口服葡萄糖耐量试验来测量空腹及2小时血糖浓度。

研究对象

17881名男性;8309名女性;年龄范围17 - 92岁。

主要观察指标

根据两套标准对糖尿病进行分类。

结果

将美国标准应用于欧洲人群导致糖尿病患病率的变化幅度从降低4.0%至增加13.2%。共有1517名之前未被诊断出的个体根据世界卫生组织或美国标准患有糖尿病。在根据美国标准诊断为糖尿病的1044人中,只有45%的人2小时血糖值符合世界卫生组织标准。分类不一致的风险随着体重指数的增加(P<0.00001)和年龄的增加(P<0.0001)而降低;性别影响不显著(P = 0.08)。

结论

从使用2小时血糖到空腹血糖这种策略转变将导致部分欧洲人群中糖尿病患病率上升。观察到这两项标准在分类上存在高度不一致。需要前瞻性数据来评估世界卫生组织或美国标准哪一个能更好地识别有发生微血管并发症和心血管疾病风险的个体。修订后的诊断标准的更广泛应用应等待前瞻性数据。

相似文献

1
Will new diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus change phenotype of patients with diabetes? Reanalysis of European epidemiological data. DECODE Study Group on behalf of the European Diabetes Epidemiology Study Group.糖尿病新诊断标准会改变糖尿病患者的表型吗?欧洲流行病学数据的重新分析。DECODE研究组代表欧洲糖尿病流行病学研究组。
BMJ. 1998 Aug 8;317(7155):371-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7155.371.
2
Is fasting glucose sufficient to define diabetes? Epidemiological data from 20 European studies. The DECODE-study group. European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative analysis of Diagnostic Criteria in Europe.空腹血糖足以用于定义糖尿病吗?来自20项欧洲研究的流行病学数据。DECODE研究组。欧洲糖尿病流行病学组。欧洲糖尿病诊断标准协作分析。
Diabetologia. 1999 Jun;42(6):647-54. doi: 10.1007/s001250051211.
3
Prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes in three American Indian populations. A comparison of the 1997 American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria and the 1985 World Health Organization diagnostic criteria: the Strong Heart Study.三个美国印第安人群中未诊断糖尿病的患病率。1997年美国糖尿病协会诊断标准与1985年世界卫生组织诊断标准的比较:强心研究。
Diabetes Care. 2000 Feb;23(2):181-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.2.181.
4
Glucose tolerance and mortality: comparison of WHO and American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria. The DECODE study group. European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative analysis Of Diagnostic criteria in Europe.葡萄糖耐量与死亡率:世界卫生组织和美国糖尿病协会诊断标准的比较。DECODE研究组。欧洲糖尿病流行病学组。欧洲糖尿病流行病学:诊断标准协作分析。
Lancet. 1999 Aug 21;354(9179):617-21.
5
Report of the Committee on the classification and diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus.糖尿病分类与诊断标准委员会报告。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2002 Jan;55(1):65-85. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8227(01)00365-5.
6
Consequences of the new diagnostic criteria for diabetes in older men and women. DECODE Study (Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative Analysis of Diagnostic Criteria in Europe).老年男性和女性糖尿病新诊断标准的后果。DECODE研究(糖尿病流行病学:欧洲诊断标准协作分析)。
Diabetes Care. 1999 Oct;22(10):1667-71. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.10.1667.
7
Impact of new diagnostic criteria for diabetes on different populations.糖尿病新诊断标准对不同人群的影响。
Diabetes Care. 1999 May;22(5):762-6. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.5.762.
8
Effects of the WHO 1985 criteria and the proposed new diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of diabetes in an elderly population.世界卫生组织1985年标准及拟议的新诊断标准对老年人群糖尿病患病率的影响。
Scand J Public Health. 2000 Dec;28(4):266-9.
9
Use of the 1997 American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria for diabetes in a Hong Kong Chinese population.1997年美国糖尿病协会糖尿病诊断标准在香港华人中的应用。
Diabetes Care. 1998 Dec;21(12):2094-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.21.12.2094.
10
The DECODE study. Diabetes epidemiology: collaborative analysis of diagnostic criteria in Europe.DECODE研究。糖尿病流行病学:欧洲诊断标准的协作分析。
Diabetes Metab. 2000 Sep;26(4):282-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Brazilian guideline for screening and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: a position statement from the Brazilian Diabetes Society.巴西2型糖尿病筛查与诊断指南:巴西糖尿病协会的立场声明
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025 Mar 4;17(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01572-w.
2
Assessing the validity of METS-IR for predicting the future onset of diabetes: an analysis using time-dependent receiver operating characteristics.评估 METS-IR 预测未来糖尿病发病的有效性:使用时间依赖性接受者操作特征分析。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2024 Nov 7;24(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12902-024-01769-0.
3
Cardiovascular complications of diabetes: role of non-coding RNAs in the crosstalk between immune and cardiovascular systems.糖尿病的心血管并发症:非编码 RNA 在免疫和心血管系统相互作用中的作用。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 May 24;22(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01842-3.
4
Assessing temporal differences in the predictive power of baseline TyG-related parameters for future diabetes: an analysis using time-dependent receiver operating characteristics.评估基线 TyG 相关参数对未来糖尿病预测能力的时间差异:使用时间依赖性接收者操作特征分析。
J Transl Med. 2023 May 4;21(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04159-7.
5
Risk of antidepressant initiation among users of cardiovascular agents and metformin. Findings from the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) and Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD), Norway: Findings from the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) and Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD), Norway.心血管药物和二甲双胍使用者开始使用抗抑郁药的风险。来自挪威特隆赫姆健康研究(HUNT)和挪威处方数据库(NorPD)的发现:来自挪威特隆赫姆健康研究(HUNT)和挪威处方数据库(NorPD)的发现。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2023 Apr;11(2):e01078. doi: 10.1002/prp2.1078.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of circular RNA for diabetes Mellitus: a systematic review and diagnostic Meta-analysis.环状 RNA 诊断糖尿病的准确性:系统评价和诊断 Meta 分析。
BMC Med Genomics. 2023 Mar 8;16(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12920-023-01476-0.
7
Expert Opinion on Diabetes Management Challenges and Role of Basal Insulin/GLP-1 RA Fixed-Ratio Combination in People with Type 2 Diabetes from Indonesia.印度尼西亚2型糖尿病患者糖尿病管理挑战及基础胰岛素/胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂固定比例联合治疗的作用专家意见
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2022 Sep 27;15:2977-2990. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S367153. eCollection 2022.
8
Ten-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk prediction for postmenopausal women: Impacts of isolated postchallenge hyperglycemia.绝经后女性的十年动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险预测:孤立性餐后高血糖的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 9;101(36):e30352. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030352.
9
Criteria for prediabetes and posttransplant diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation: A 2-year diagnostic accuracy study of participants from a randomized controlled trial.肾移植后糖尿病前期和移植后糖尿病的诊断标准:一项针对随机对照试验参与者的为期两年的诊断准确性研究。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Dec;22(12):2880-2891. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17187. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
10
Cost-effectiveness of community diabetes screening: Application of Akaike information criterion in rural communities of Nigeria.社区糖尿病筛查的成本效益:尼日利亚农村社区中 Akaike 信息准则的应用。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 25;10:932631. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.932631. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Metabolic syndrome' in a middle-aged Finnish population.中年芬兰人群中的“代谢综合征”
J Cardiovasc Risk. 1997 Aug;4(4):291-5.
2
Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus.糖尿病诊断与分类专家委员会报告
Diabetes Care. 1997 Jul;20(7):1183-97. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.7.1183.
3
Body mass index, waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, and glucose intolerance in Chinese and Europid adults in Newcastle, UK.英国纽卡斯尔市中国和欧洲裔成年人的体重指数、腰围、腰臀比及葡萄糖耐量情况
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Apr;51(2):160-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.2.160.
4
Comparison of fasting and 2-hour glucose and HbA1c levels for diagnosing diabetes. Diagnostic criteria and performance revisited.空腹及餐后2小时血糖与糖化血红蛋白水平在糖尿病诊断中的比较。重新审视诊断标准及效能。
Diabetes Care. 1997 May;20(5):785-91. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.5.785.
5
Elevated fasting plasma insulin in a general aged population: an innocent companion of cardiovascular diseases.普通老年人群空腹血浆胰岛素升高:心血管疾病的无害伴生物。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Apr;45(4):407-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05163.x.
6
Diagnosing diabetes mellitus--do we need new criteria?诊断糖尿病——我们需要新的标准吗?
Diabetologia. 1997 Mar;40(3):247-55. doi: 10.1007/s001250050671.
7
Revision of diagnostic criteria for diabetes.糖尿病诊断标准的修订。
Lancet. 1996 Dec 14;348(9042):1657-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)65719-4.
8
Structure and costs of health care of diabetic patients in Finland.芬兰糖尿病患者的医疗保健结构与成本。
Diabetes Care. 1996 May;19(5):494-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.19.5.494.
9
Prevalence and determinants of glucose intolerance in a Dutch caucasian population. The Hoorn Study.荷兰白种人群中葡萄糖不耐受的患病率及其决定因素。霍伦研究。
Diabetes Care. 1995 Sep;18(9):1270-3. doi: 10.2337/diacare.18.9.1270.
10
Risk factors for early death in non-insulin dependent diabetes and men with known glucose tolerance status.非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病及已知糖耐量状态男性患者早期死亡的危险因素。
BMJ. 1993 Jul 31;307(6899):295-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6899.295.