• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

世界卫生组织1985年标准及拟议的新诊断标准对老年人群糖尿病患病率的影响。

Effects of the WHO 1985 criteria and the proposed new diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of diabetes in an elderly population.

作者信息

Hiltunen L A, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S M

机构信息

Department of Public Health Science and General Practice, University of Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Scand J Public Health. 2000 Dec;28(4):266-9.

PMID:11228113
Abstract

Population data suggest that a fasting blood glucose level of > or = 6.1 mmol/l corresponds best to a two-hour blood glucose level of > or = 11.1 mmol/l, which is associated with an increased risk of developing microvascular complications. The proposed new criteria, and the WHO 1985 criteria for diabetes, were applied in an elderly population, which underwent a two-hour oral glucose tolerance test. The prevalence of diabetes was higher when the proposed new criteria were used than when the old criteria were used. In calculating the prevalence of diabetes, the fasting blood glucose > or = 6.1 mmol/l corresponded better to the combination of fasting and/or two-hour values than did fasting blood glucose > or = 6.7 mmol/l. The prevalence obtained by using either of these fasting values alone or in combination with two-hour values corresponded poorly to that obtained by using mere two-hour blood glucose values.

摘要

人群数据表明,空腹血糖水平≥6.1 mmol/L最能对应两小时血糖水平≥11.1 mmol/L,而这与微血管并发症发生风险增加相关。在接受两小时口服葡萄糖耐量试验的老年人群中应用了提议的新诊断标准以及世界卫生组织1985年的糖尿病诊断标准。使用提议的新诊断标准时糖尿病患病率高于使用旧标准时。在计算糖尿病患病率时,空腹血糖≥6.1 mmol/L比空腹血糖≥6.7 mmol/L更能与空腹和/或两小时血糖值的组合情况相匹配。单独使用这两种空腹血糖值中的任何一种或与两小时血糖值结合使用所得到的患病率,与仅使用两小时血糖值所得到的患病率相关性较差。

相似文献

1
Effects of the WHO 1985 criteria and the proposed new diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of diabetes in an elderly population.世界卫生组织1985年标准及拟议的新诊断标准对老年人群糖尿病患病率的影响。
Scand J Public Health. 2000 Dec;28(4):266-9.
2
[Comparison of ADA and WHO diagnostic criteria for diabetes diagnosis and other categories of glucose intolerance ].[美国糖尿病协会(ADA)与世界卫生组织(WHO)糖尿病诊断及其他类别糖耐量异常诊断标准的比较]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2002 Oct;13(76):316-20.
3
Fasting cut-offs in determining the prevalence of diabetes and intermediate glucose abnormality in a non-obese population.非肥胖人群中确定糖尿病患病率和中间血糖异常的空腹血糖切点
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2004 Dec;30(3):105-14.
4
The DECODE study. Diabetes epidemiology: collaborative analysis of diagnostic criteria in Europe.DECODE研究。糖尿病流行病学:欧洲诊断标准的协作分析。
Diabetes Metab. 2000 Sep;26(4):282-6.
5
[What are the consequences of the new American guidelines for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in The Netherlands?].[美国糖尿病诊断新指南对荷兰有何影响?]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998 Jan 31;142(5):222-5.
6
Features of isolated post-challenge hyperglycaemia in Jamaican adults.牙买加成年人中单纯挑战后高血糖的特征。
West Indian Med J. 2004 Jan;53(1):7-11.
7
New classification and criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The Australasian Working Party on Diagnostic Criteria for Diabetes Mellitus.糖尿病诊断的新分类与标准。澳大利亚糖尿病诊断标准工作小组。
N Z Med J. 1999 Apr 23;112(1086):139-41.
8
Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant females.孕妇妊娠糖尿病的筛查
Saudi Med J. 2000 Feb;21(2):155-60.
9
Comparison of The World Health Organization (WHO) two-step strategy and OGTT for diabetes mellitus screening.世界卫生组织(WHO)两步法策略与口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)用于糖尿病筛查的比较。
Acta Med Indones. 2004 Jan-Mar;36(1):3-7.
10
[New diagnostic criteria and classification of diabetes mellitus].[糖尿病新的诊断标准与分类]
Lijec Vjesn. 2000 May-Jun;122(5-6):99-102.