• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[New principles of reporting in occupational health services--bureaucracy or an effective marker instruments?].

作者信息

Durasiewicz Z

机构信息

Zakładu Organizacji Ochrony Zdrowia, Instytutu Medycyny Pracy im., Lodzi.

出版信息

Med Pr. 1998;49(2):191-200.

PMID:9695067
Abstract

A several-year process of transformation in occupational health services (OHS) was concluded with the Occupational Health Services Act adopted by Polish Parliament on 27 June 1997. By the time the Act came into effect, a whole series of executive regulations had been lain down. The Act like its executive regulations came into force on 1 January 1998. In view of the new Act, the system of reporting on the OHS activities and resources became inadequate and did not correspond with the reality. To this end, there was a great need to develop new principles of the reporting system as well as new reporting forms which could replace those binding thus far, and satisfy new requirements arising from modified organizational schemes and responsibilities. The work began in the Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine in 1995. Then the first drafted forms for annual reports on prevention carried out by occupational doctors and voivodship OHS centres were presented. In the new system, occupational doctors responsible for prevention, and not health care centres, are committed to present reports. So that, together with the competence the reporting responsibility is placed on a given person and not on an institution. A practising occupational doctor can be a primary OHS units, and at the same time he/she can practice in occupational health centre providing preventive care of workers, according to the provisions of the Act, within his/her responsibilities. Both report forms, part one and part two, are supplied with detailed instructions how they should be completed. The pattern and context of the forms as well as instructions have been agreed upon with the executives, specialistic supervision and the National Center for Health System Management in Warsaw.

摘要

相似文献

1
[New principles of reporting in occupational health services--bureaucracy or an effective marker instruments?].
Med Pr. 1998;49(2):191-200.
2
Legal regulations on occupational health system in Poland.波兰职业健康体系的法律法规。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2001;14(1):43-9.
3
Financing occupational health services in Poland.波兰职业健康服务的融资
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2002 Oct;75 Suppl:S10-3. doi: 10.1007/s00420-002-0352-2. Epub 2002 Jul 4.
4
Present principles of workers' health care organization in Poland and directions of future changes.波兰当前的职工医疗保健组织原则及未来变革方向。
Pol J Occup Med Environ Health. 1993;6(4):341-5.
5
[Sources of finance for provincial occupational health services. Theory and practice].[省级职业健康服务的资金来源。理论与实践]
Med Pr. 1999;50(2):125-33.
6
Certification and quality assurance in Dutch occupational health services.荷兰职业健康服务中的认证与质量保证。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2002;15(2):173-7.
7
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
8
[New Polish regulations regarding accidents in the workplace].
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2003 Apr-Jun;53(2):173-9.
9
Polish approach to the quality assurance system in occupational health services.波兰职业健康服务质量保证体系的方法。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 1998;11(3):209-15.
10
[Transformation of ownership in occupational health services].
Med Pr. 1995;46(3):255-62.