Butler J R
West J Med. 1976 Sep;125(3):253-8.
With new legislation and favorable case law developments, many providers of health care services are turning to binding arbitration agreements as a partial solution to the medical malpractice crisis. Existing data indicate tremendous advantages can be gained from the use of such agreements, if they are carefully drawn to comply with new law, tailored to the particular situation in which they will be used and coupled with appropriate procedures to secure the intended benefits. Arbitration is not a substitute for insurance, but if a provider has taken the calculated risk of forgoing insurance he should not be without a carefully drawn binding arbitration agreement.
随着新立法和有利的判例法发展,许多医疗服务提供者正转向具有约束力的仲裁协议,作为医疗事故危机的部分解决方案。现有数据表明,如果此类协议精心拟定以符合新法律,根据其使用的特定情况进行调整,并辅之以适当程序以确保预期收益,那么使用这些协议可带来巨大优势。仲裁并非保险的替代品,但如果提供者已承担了放弃保险的风险,那么他不应没有精心拟定的具有约束力的仲裁协议。