Suppr超能文献

医疗事故仲裁尚未实现的潜力。

The unrealized potential of malpractice arbitration.

作者信息

Metzloff T B

机构信息

Duke University School of Law, USA.

出版信息

Spec Law Dig Health Care Law. 1997 Jan(215):9-36.

Abstract

Although the use of arbitration in the commercial arena has increased tremendously in recent years, there has been a reluctance to adopt arbitration of medical malpractice claims in place of litigation. After discussing the benefits of arbitration in medical malpractice cases, Professor Metzloff examines why the use of arbitration has not become predominant, discussing such factors as judicial hostility, failure of state statutes designed to encourage arbitration, and lack of hard evidence that arbitration works. Professor Metzloff then explores the future of arbitration in medical malpractice cases, citing examples from his own work experience with Duke Law School's Private Adjudication Center, and discusses attributes which would make malpractice arbitration successful in the future.

摘要

尽管近年来仲裁在商业领域的使用大幅增加,但人们一直不愿采用医疗事故索赔仲裁来取代诉讼。在讨论了医疗事故案件中仲裁的好处之后,梅茨洛夫教授研究了为什么仲裁的使用没有占据主导地位,探讨了诸如司法敌意、旨在鼓励仲裁的州法规未能发挥作用以及缺乏仲裁有效运作的确凿证据等因素。梅茨洛夫教授随后以自己在杜克大学法学院私人裁决中心的工作经验为例,探讨了医疗事故案件仲裁的未来,并讨论了未来使医疗事故仲裁成功所需的特质。

引用本文的文献

1
Malpractice in Mexico: arbitration not litigation.
BMJ. 2005 Aug 20;331(7514):448-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7514.448.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验