Suppr超能文献

HIV-1病毒载量:阿根廷三种市售检测方法的比较评估

HIV-1 viral load: comparative evaluation of three commercially available assays in Argentina.

作者信息

Hodara V, Monticelli A, Pampuro S, Salomón H, Jauregui Rueda H, Libonatti O

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, University of Buenos Aires' School of Medicine, Argentina.

出版信息

Acta Physiol Pharmacol Ther Latinoam. 1998;48(2):107-13.

PMID:9695883
Abstract

Viral load (HIV-RNA copies per milliliter of plasma) has good correlation to prognosis considering progression to AIDS. The evaluation of commercial kits to measure viral load has become a need to find the most specific, sensitive and reproducible procedure to follow up HIV-infected patients. Hereby, a comparative analysis was done by using three different assays available in Argentina for quantitation of HIV-RNA in plasma. A plasma panel: 20 from HIV-1 infected individuals (9 asymptomatic and 11 symptomatic) and 9 from HIV-1 seronegative individuals was studied. Samples were run by Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor (Roche Diagnostic System, USA) Quantiplex HIV-1 RNA 2.0 Assay (Chiron Corporation, USA) and NASBA HIV-1 RNA QT (Organon Teknika, Holland). RNA was extracted from 0.2 ml of plasma for Amplicor, 0.1 ml and 1 ml of plasma for NASBA and, duplicates of 1 ml of plasma was centrifuged and pellet was used for bDNA assay no RNA extraction step. For a given specimen, a log difference of < 0.5 between assays was considered as concordant result. All seronegative samples were bellow the detection limit for all assays (Amplicor 200 c/ml, NASBA 400 c/ml and Quantiplex (bDNA) 500 c/ml). Two samples from asymptomatic patients were not detectable by NASBA (Sensitivity: 90%) Sensitivity was increased to 100% by using 1 ml of plasma. All samples were detectable by the other assays (sensitivity: 100%). For NASBA-bDNA, 74% samples were concordant, 35% for Amplicor-bDNA and 53% for NASBA-Amplicor. By using 1 ml of plasma from asymptomatic patients, concordance was 65% for NASBA-bDNA and 60% for NASBA Amplicor. Comparing samples from asymptomatic patients, only 22% was concordant in both cases. Reproducibility of NASBA was low (33% with differences lower than 0.5 Log) when 0.1 and 1 ml were used. Due to the levels of concordance of these results, it would be suggested to use always the same technique to follow up HIV-1 infection. The reproducibility of the assays should be tested by every laboratory and for every technician in charge of the assay in order to have confidence in the results specially to follow up HIV-infected patients or to monitor anti-viral therapies.

摘要

考虑到艾滋病的进展情况,病毒载量(每毫升血浆中的HIV-RNA拷贝数)与预后具有良好的相关性。评估用于测量病毒载量的商业试剂盒已成为寻找最特异、敏感和可重复的程序以随访HIV感染患者的需求。因此,使用阿根廷现有的三种不同检测方法对血浆中的HIV-RNA进行定量分析。研究了一个血浆样本组:20份来自HIV-1感染个体(9例无症状,11例有症状),9份来自HIV-1血清阴性个体。样本通过Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor(美国罗氏诊断系统公司)、Quantiplex HIV-1 RNA 2.0检测法(美国Chiron公司)和NASBA HIV-1 RNA QT(荷兰Organon Teknika公司)进行检测。从0.2毫升血浆中提取RNA用于Amplicor检测,从0.1毫升和1毫升血浆中提取RNA用于NASBA检测,将1毫升血浆的复制品离心,沉淀物用于bDNA检测,无需RNA提取步骤。对于给定的标本,检测方法之间的对数差异<0.5被视为一致结果。所有血清阴性样本在所有检测方法中均低于检测限(Amplicor为200拷贝/毫升,NASBA为400拷贝/毫升,Quantiplex(bDNA)为500拷贝/毫升)。NASBA检测法无法检测到2例无症状患者的样本(敏感性:90%),使用1毫升血浆时敏感性提高到100%。所有样本均可被其他检测方法检测到(敏感性:100%)。对于NASBA-bDNA,74%的样本结果一致,Amplicor-bDNA为35%,NASBA-Amplicor为53%。使用无症状患者的1毫升血浆时,NASBA-bDNA的一致性为65%,NASBA-Amplicor为60%。比较无症状患者的样本,两种情况下只有22%的结果一致。当使用0.1毫升和1毫升血浆时,NASBA的可重复性较低(差异低于0.5对数时为33%)。由于这些结果的一致性水平,建议始终使用相同的技术随访HIV-1感染情况。每个实验室以及负责检测的每位技术人员都应测试检测方法的可重复性,以便对结果有信心,特别是在随访HIV感染患者或监测抗病毒治疗时。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验