Suppr超能文献

微量白蛋白尿中白蛋白测定免疫化学方法的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of immunochemical methods for estimation of albumin in microalbuminuria.

作者信息

Pati S S, Taori C B, Rajan M G, Bhatkar S V, Thakar Y S, Chande C, Saoji A M

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram.

出版信息

Indian J Biochem Biophys. 1998 Feb;35(1):48-51.

PMID:9699419
Abstract

Three immuno assays namely radioimmunoassay (RIA), radial immunodiffusion (RID) and rocket immunoelectrophoresis (RIE) were compared for their performance and utility. The accuracy limits of the methods were compared and also between methods using RIA as the reference. Urine samples, from known diabetic patients with albumin concentration ranging from 2.5 mg/l to 120 mg/l were analysed by the three methods. The mean differences were only 0.91 mg/dl and 0.5 mg/dl respectively for RID vs RIA and rocket vs RIA which is not statistically significant. Excellent correlation was seen between RIA and RIE (r = 0.98) and also between RIA and RID (r = 0.97). Compared to RID, RIE required less time and was more precise. RIA is suited for assaying large sample loads yet not suited for laboratories receiving samples occasionally. For a small pathological laboratory with limited facility rocket electrophoresis may be the most suitable method taking into consideration accuracy, time and cost.

摘要

对放射免疫分析(RIA)、单向免疫扩散(RID)和火箭免疫电泳(RIE)这三种免疫测定方法的性能和实用性进行了比较。比较了这些方法的准确度极限,并以RIA作为参考,比较了各方法之间的准确度极限。用这三种方法分析了已知糖尿病患者的尿液样本,其白蛋白浓度范围为2.5毫克/升到120毫克/升。RID与RIA以及火箭免疫电泳与RIA的平均差异分别仅为0.91毫克/分升和0.5毫克/分升,无统计学意义。RIA与RIE之间(r = 0.98)以及RIA与RID之间(r = 0.97)均呈现出极好的相关性。与RID相比,RIE所需时间更少且更精确。RIA适合检测大量样本,但不适合偶尔接收样本的实验室。对于设备有限的小型病理实验室而言,考虑到准确性、时间和成本,火箭电泳可能是最合适的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验