Pati S S, Taori C B, Rajan M G, Bhatkar S V, Thakar Y S, Chande C, Saoji A M
Department of Biochemistry, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram.
Indian J Biochem Biophys. 1998 Feb;35(1):48-51.
Three immuno assays namely radioimmunoassay (RIA), radial immunodiffusion (RID) and rocket immunoelectrophoresis (RIE) were compared for their performance and utility. The accuracy limits of the methods were compared and also between methods using RIA as the reference. Urine samples, from known diabetic patients with albumin concentration ranging from 2.5 mg/l to 120 mg/l were analysed by the three methods. The mean differences were only 0.91 mg/dl and 0.5 mg/dl respectively for RID vs RIA and rocket vs RIA which is not statistically significant. Excellent correlation was seen between RIA and RIE (r = 0.98) and also between RIA and RID (r = 0.97). Compared to RID, RIE required less time and was more precise. RIA is suited for assaying large sample loads yet not suited for laboratories receiving samples occasionally. For a small pathological laboratory with limited facility rocket electrophoresis may be the most suitable method taking into consideration accuracy, time and cost.
对放射免疫分析(RIA)、单向免疫扩散(RID)和火箭免疫电泳(RIE)这三种免疫测定方法的性能和实用性进行了比较。比较了这些方法的准确度极限,并以RIA作为参考,比较了各方法之间的准确度极限。用这三种方法分析了已知糖尿病患者的尿液样本,其白蛋白浓度范围为2.5毫克/升到120毫克/升。RID与RIA以及火箭免疫电泳与RIA的平均差异分别仅为0.91毫克/分升和0.5毫克/分升,无统计学意义。RIA与RIE之间(r = 0.98)以及RIA与RID之间(r = 0.97)均呈现出极好的相关性。与RID相比,RIE所需时间更少且更精确。RIA适合检测大量样本,但不适合偶尔接收样本的实验室。对于设备有限的小型病理实验室而言,考虑到准确性、时间和成本,火箭电泳可能是最合适的方法。