Suppr超能文献

用于测定尿中低浓度白蛋白的免疫化学方法评估。

Assessment of immunochemical methods for determining low concentrations of albumin in urine.

作者信息

Watts G F, Bennett J E, Rowe D J, Morris R W, Gatling W, Shaw K M, Polak A

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1986 Aug;32(8):1544-8.

PMID:3089644
Abstract

Four immunochemical methods (radioimmunoassay, RIA; radial immunodiffusion, RID; immunoturbidimetry, IT; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA) for measuring urinary albumin at low concentrations were assessed for their assay characteristics and practicability. Precision and accuracy were comparable between the methods when studied individually. We made a method comparison, with RIA as reference, using urine samples from diabetic patients with albumin concentrations ranging from 1 to 120 mg/L. There was no significant systematic difference between RID and RIA, but IT and ELISA gave consistently lower values than RIA, the mean differences being 1.8 (p less than 0.01) and 9.7 mg/L (p less than 0.001), respectively. Random error, compared with that for RIA, was in increasing order: RID (residual SD = 3.8 mg/L); IT (4.3 mg/L); ELISA (7.3 mg/L). The difference between the methods increased with the albumin concentration. Operational cost was highest with IT, lowest with RIA. Capital cost was highest with RIA and lowest with RID, which required most technical skill. ELISA had intermediate overall costs.

摘要

对四种用于测量低浓度尿白蛋白的免疫化学方法(放射免疫分析,RIA;单向免疫扩散,RID;免疫比浊法,IT;酶联免疫吸附测定,ELISA)的分析特性和实用性进行了评估。单独研究时,各方法之间的精密度和准确度相当。我们以RIA为参考方法,对白蛋白浓度在1至120mg/L之间的糖尿病患者尿液样本进行了方法比较。RID与RIA之间无显著系统差异,但IT和ELISA得出的值始终低于RIA,平均差异分别为1.8(p<0.01)和9.7mg/L(p<0.001)。与RIA相比,随机误差从小到大依次为:RID(剩余标准差=3.8mg/L);IT(4.3mg/L);ELISA(7.3mg/L)。各方法之间的差异随白蛋白浓度的增加而增大。操作成本以IT最高,RIA最低。设备成本以RIA最高,RID最低,RID需要最高的技术技能。ELISA的总体成本居中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验