Ho P L, Chow K H, Yuen K Y, Ng W S, Chau P Y
Department of Microbiology, University of Hong Kong.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998 Jul;42(1):49-54. doi: 10.1093/jac/42.1.49.
A novel, inhibitor-potentiated disc-diffusion test for detecting extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) in bacteria was evaluated. This test uses the principle of augmentation (by > or = 10 mm) of inhibition zones produced by ceftazidime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone or aztreonam discs on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with clavulanate (4 mg/L). The test was initially compared with the double-disc synergy test, Kirby-Bauer disc-diffusion test and Etest ESBL screen with a panel of 45 reference strains with known resistance profiles. This panel consisted of 27 ESBL-positive Escherichia coli strains expressing 14 Bush group 2be enzymes and 18 other E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains (14 non-ESBL beta-lactamase producers and four non-beta-lactamase producers). The Kirby-Bauer disc-diffusion test was the least sensitive method: 11-44% of the ESBL-positive control strains were misclassified as susceptible to ceftazidime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone or aztreonam when interpreted by National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) criteria. The sensitivities of the inhibitor-potentiated disc-diffusion test, the double-disc synergy test (when discs were 25 or 30 mm apart) and the Etest ESBL screen (with a breakpoint of > 4-fold reduction in ceftazidime MIC in the presence of clavulanate) were 100%, 96% and 89-96%, respectively. The inhibitor-potentiated disc-diffusion test was further evaluated with 81 E. coli and K. pneumoniae clinical isolates, which were identified as putative ESBL-producers by the double-disc synergy test. For these isolates, the sensitivity of both the inhibitor-potentiated disc-diffusion test and the Etest ESBL screen was 100%. In conclusion, the inhibitor-potentiated disc-diffusion test is a sensitive, convenient and inexpensive method of screening for ESBLs in E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates, with potential for incorporation into routine clinical laboratory service.
对一种用于检测细菌中广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBLs)的新型抑制剂增强纸片扩散试验进行了评估。该试验利用在补充有克拉维酸(4mg/L)的穆勒-欣顿琼脂上,头孢他啶、头孢噻肟、头孢曲松或氨曲南纸片产生的抑菌圈增大(≥10mm)的原理。最初将该试验与双纸片协同试验、 Kirby-Bauer纸片扩散试验以及Etest ESBL筛选法进行比较,使用一组45株具有已知耐药谱的参考菌株。该组包括27株表达14种布什2be组酶的ESBL阳性大肠杆菌菌株以及18株其他大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌菌株(14株非ESBLβ-内酰胺酶产生菌和4株非β-内酰胺酶产生菌)。Kirby-Bauer纸片扩散试验是最不敏感的方法:按照美国国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)标准解释时,11%-44%的ESBL阳性对照菌株被误分类为对头孢他啶、头孢噻肟、头孢曲松或氨曲南敏感。抑制剂增强纸片扩散试验、双纸片协同试验(纸片间距为25或30mm时)以及Etest ESBL筛选法(在有克拉维酸存在时头孢他啶MIC降低>4倍的折点)的敏感性分别为100%、96%和89%-96%。用81株大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌临床分离株对抑制剂增强纸片扩散试验作进一步评估,这些分离株通过双纸片协同试验被鉴定为推定的ESBL产生菌。对于这些分离株,抑制剂增强纸片扩散试验和Etest ESBL筛选法的敏感性均为100%。总之,抑制剂增强纸片扩散试验是一种敏感、便捷且廉价的筛选大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌分离株中ESBLs的方法,有潜力纳入常规临床实验室检测。