Suppr超能文献

新型合成材料与传统方法修复腹壁筋膜外露缺损的比较

Comparison of novel synthetic materials with traditional methods to repair exposed abdominal wall fascial defects.

作者信息

Aliabadi-Wahle S, Cnota M, Choe E, Jacob J T, Flint L M, Ferrara J J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

出版信息

J Invest Surg. 1998 Mar-Apr;11(2):97-104. doi: 10.3109/08941939809032188.

Abstract

Repair of large abdominal wall defects is a challenge, particularly when full-thickness tissue loss prohibits coverage of the fascial repair. Two novel synthetic materials (TMS-1 and TMS-2) have been shown to be better accepted than expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex), and polypropylene (Marlex) in the closure of clean and contaminated fascial wounds that are immediately covered by skin/soft tissue. Therefore, 1-cm2 abdominal wall defects were created in each of the four quadrants of rat groups. Gore-Tex, Marlex, and TMS-1 or TMS-2 were used to repair three defects, the fourth being primarily closed. To ensure that each repair remained exposed, skin edges were sutured to underlying muscle. Additional animal groups underwent the same protocol; however, peritonitis was induced at surgery using a fecal inoculum technique. Animals were sacrificed 2 weeks later, at which time a blinded observer assessed the surface area and severity of adhesions. In clean wounds, the surface area of formed adhesions was less (p < .004) after primary closure than each synthetic material; among the synthetics, TMS-2 caused significantly (p < .01) less extensive adhesions than Marlex. In addition, the severity of adhesions to TMS-2 was comparable to that of defects closed primarily, and less severe (p < .02) than those formed to Gore-Tex and Marlex. In animals with peritonitis, primary closure caused less extensive (p < .03) adhesions than Marlex and Gore-Tex and significantly (p < .002) less severe adhesions than Marlex, Gore-Tex, and TMS-2. However, the severity of adhesions formed to TMS-1 repairs proved comparable to primarily closed wounds. These experiments reaffirm the tenet that, whenever possible, abdominal wounds should undergo primary fascial closure. When soft tissue coverage over the repair cannot be achieved, TMS-2 is well tolerated in clean wounds. However, the superiority of TMS-1 over the other synthetic materials in contaminated wounds suggests it may also ultimately prove to be of clinical utility.

摘要

修复大面积腹壁缺损是一项挑战,尤其是当全层组织缺失导致无法覆盖筋膜修复处时。在清洁和污染的筋膜伤口闭合且立即被皮肤/软组织覆盖的情况下,两种新型合成材料(TMS - 1和TMS - 2)已被证明比膨体聚四氟乙烯(戈尔特斯)和聚丙烯(玛莱克斯)更易被接受。因此,在大鼠组的四个象限中各创建一个1平方厘米的腹壁缺损。用戈尔特斯、玛莱克斯和TMS - 1或TMS - 2修复三个缺损,第四个缺损进行一期缝合。为确保每次修复都保持暴露状态,将皮肤边缘缝合至下方肌肉。其他动物组采用相同方案;然而,在手术时使用粪便接种技术诱发腹膜炎。2周后处死动物,此时由一名不知情的观察者评估粘连的表面积和严重程度。在清洁伤口中,一期缝合后形成粘连的表面积比每种合成材料都小(p < .004);在合成材料中,TMS - 2导致的粘连范围明显比玛莱克斯小(p < .01)。此外,与TMS - 2粘连的严重程度与一期缝合的缺损相当,且比与戈尔特斯和玛莱克斯形成的粘连轻(p < .02)。在患有腹膜炎的动物中,一期缝合导致的粘连范围比玛莱克斯和戈尔特斯小(p < .03),且粘连严重程度明显比玛莱克斯、戈尔特斯和TMS - 2轻(p < .002)。然而,TMS - 1修复形成的粘连严重程度与一期缝合的伤口相当。这些实验再次证实了这一原则:只要有可能,腹部伤口应进行一期筋膜缝合。当无法实现对修复处的软组织覆盖时,TMS - 2在清洁伤口中耐受性良好。然而,TMS - 1在污染伤口中相对于其他合成材料的优越性表明,它最终可能也具有临床实用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验