Suppr超能文献

闪光频率和间歇性光刺激重复对光阵发性反应的影响。

Effects of flash frequency and repetition of intermittent photic stimulation on photoparoxysmal responses.

作者信息

Topalkara K, Alarcón G, Binnie C D

机构信息

Institute of Epileptology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Seizure. 1998 Jun;7(3):249-55. doi: 10.1016/s1059-1311(98)80044-7.

Abstract

The protocol used for intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) may determine the likelihood of evoking a photoparoxysmal response (PPR). One-hundred and thirty-five electroencephalograms (EEGs) presenting PPRs, from 125 patients were studied in order to identify the most effective stimulation frequency to evoke a PPR and the effects of repetition of IPS on the occurrence of a PPR. Two stimulation protocols were used: protocol I (starting at 18 Hz and then testing at 2, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 Hz) and protocol II (stimulating at 2, 6, 8, 10, 15, 18, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 Hz). Protocol I was used for patients not known to be photosensitive whereas protocol II was used for patients known to be photosensitive before recording. Both latency and PPR grade for frequencies which evoked PPR were measured in all records. The most epileptogenic frequencies (those evoking grade 4 PPRs at the shortest latency) were within the range 15-18 Hz for both protocols. In the records where the IPS was repeated at the same frequency, the PPR latency and grade seen during the first and second stimulation trial were studied in order to establish habituation or potentiation of responses. Repetition of IPS at the same frequency induced habituation more often than potentiation, but only if trials were repeated consecutively which suggests that habituation is frequency specific and trials repeated during EEG recordings to confirm photosensitivity to a particular frequency should be separated in time or be non-consecutive. Five patients studied with protocol I (10.6%) showed a grade 4 PPR only during the initial trial at 18 Hz. Thus, as a general screening procedure for testing for photosensitivity commencing stimulation at 18 flashes/s appears to be justified. The combination of two different protocols delivered to patients with and without a history of photosensitivity appears to achieve a sensible compromise having a high likelihood of demonstrating photosensitivity with a minimum risk of precipitating seizures.

摘要

用于间歇性光刺激(IPS)的方案可能决定诱发光阵发性反应(PPR)的可能性。对125例患者的135份出现PPR的脑电图(EEG)进行了研究,以确定诱发PPR的最有效刺激频率以及IPS重复对PPR发生的影响。使用了两种刺激方案:方案I(从18Hz开始,然后依次测试2、6、8、10、15、20、30、40、50、60Hz)和方案II(以2、6、8、10、15、18、20、30、40、50、60Hz进行刺激)。方案I用于未知是否为光敏性的患者,而方案II用于记录前已知为光敏性的患者。在所有记录中均测量了诱发PPR的频率的潜伏期和PPR分级。两种方案中,最易诱发癫痫的频率(即潜伏期最短时诱发4级PPR的频率)均在15 - 18Hz范围内。在以相同频率重复IPS的记录中,研究了第一次和第二次刺激试验期间的PPR潜伏期和分级,以确定反应的习惯化或增强情况。在相同频率下重复IPS诱发习惯化的情况比增强更为常见,但前提是试验要连续重复,这表明习惯化具有频率特异性,并且在EEG记录期间为确认对特定频率的光敏性而重复的试验应在时间上分开或不连续。使用方案I研究的5例患者(10.6%)仅在初始18Hz试验期间出现4级PPR。因此,作为检测光敏性的一般筛查程序,以18次/秒开始刺激似乎是合理的。将两种不同方案应用于有和没有光敏性病史的患者,似乎实现了一种合理的折衷,即很有可能证明光敏性,同时将诱发癫痫发作的风险降至最低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验