• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院前环境下经胸阻抗和峰值电流对除颤成功率的影响。

Effects of transthoracic impedance and peak current flow on defibrillation success in a prehospital setting.

作者信息

Heavens J P, Cleland M J, Maloney J P, Rowe B H

机构信息

Ottawa-Carleton Base Hospital Program, Ottawa General Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Aug;32(2):191-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70136-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70136-2
PMID:9701302
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess whether transthoracic impedance and peak current are determinants of defibrillation success in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was carried out in a suburban Canadian EMS system. Participants were patients who experienced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the regional municipality of Ottawa-Carleton, had VF rhythm at presentation, and received countershocks from the Laerdal Heartstart 2000 automated external defibrillator.

RESULTS

A total of 310 patients met the inclusion criteria. Collectively they received 717 countershocks. The first shocks were successful in converting VF rhythm 25.5% of the time. The most important determinant of shock success was the interval from when the call was received until delivery of the first shock (P<.01). Length of time at scene, current, impedance, and patient age were not significant determinants of success of first shock. The time interval until first shock was also a determinant of survival (P<.01). EMS response time, whether the arrest was witnessed, initial impedance, and current were not determinants of survival.

CONCLUSION

OHCA shock success and survival are associated with EMS system factors such as the interval from when the call was received until delivery of the first shock. The importance of impedance and peak current remain theoretic for out-of-hospital defibrillation success and did not influence defibrillation success in this study.

摘要

研究目的

评估经胸阻抗和峰值电流是否为院外心室颤动(VF)患者除颤成功的决定因素。

方法

在加拿大一个郊区的急救医疗服务(EMS)系统中开展了一项回顾性队列研究。参与者为在渥太华 - 卡尔顿地区自治市发生院外心脏骤停、就诊时为VF心律且接受了Laerdal Heartstart 2000自动体外除颤器电击的患者。

结果

共有310名患者符合纳入标准。他们总共接受了717次电击。首次电击成功转复VF心律的时间占25.5%。电击成功的最重要决定因素是从接到呼叫到首次电击的时间间隔(P<0.01)。现场停留时间、电流、阻抗和患者年龄不是首次电击成功的显著决定因素。到首次电击的时间间隔也是生存的一个决定因素(P<0.01)。急救医疗服务响应时间、心脏骤停是否被目击、初始阻抗和电流不是生存的决定因素。

结论

院外心脏骤停电击成功和生存与急救医疗服务系统因素相关,如从接到呼叫到首次电击的时间间隔。阻抗和峰值电流对于院外除颤成功的重要性仍停留在理论层面,在本研究中并未影响除颤成功。

相似文献

1
Effects of transthoracic impedance and peak current flow on defibrillation success in a prehospital setting.院前环境下经胸阻抗和峰值电流对除颤成功率的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Aug;32(2):191-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70136-2.
2
Defibrillation probability and impedance change between shocks during resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停复苏期间电击之间的除颤概率和阻抗变化。
Resuscitation. 2009 Jul;80(7):773-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 May 6.
3
Transthoracic impedance does not decrease with rapidly repeated countershocks in a swine cardiac arrest model.在猪心脏骤停模型中,经胸阻抗不会随着快速重复的电击而降低。
Resuscitation. 2003 Jan;56(1):91-5. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00292-7.
4
Use of automated external defibrillators by police officers for treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.警察使用自动体外除颤器治疗院外心脏骤停。
Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Aug;32(2):200-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(98)70137-4.
5
Early out-of-hospital experience with an impedance-compensating low-energy biphasic waveform automatic external defibrillator.阻抗补偿型低能量双相波自动体外除颤器的早期院外使用经验
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1997 Nov;1(3):203-8; discussion 209-10. doi: 10.1023/a:1009712721915.
6
Transthoracic impedance does not affect defibrillation, resuscitation or survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with a non-escalating biphasic waveform defibrillator.经胸阻抗不影响使用非递增双相波除颤器治疗的院外心脏骤停患者的除颤、复苏或生存率。
Resuscitation. 2005 Jan;64(1):63-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.06.021.
7
Scaling exponent predicts defibrillation success for out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest.标度指数可预测院外心室颤动心脏骤停的除颤成功率。
Circulation. 2001 Mar 27;103(12):1656-61. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.12.1656.
8
Determinants of successful transthoracic defibrillation and outcome in ventricular fibrillation.成功进行经胸除颤及心室颤动转归的决定因素
Br Heart J. 1991 Jun;65(6):311-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.65.6.311.
9
Defibrillation waveform and post-shock rhythm in out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest.院外心室颤动心脏骤停的除颤波形及电击后心律
Resuscitation. 2003 Nov;59(2):189-96. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00183-7.
10
A prospective, randomised and blinded comparison of first shock success of monophasic and biphasic waveforms in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停时单相波与双相波首次电击成功率的前瞻性、随机、盲法比较。
Resuscitation. 2003 Jul;58(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00106-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of peak current in conversion of patients with ventricular fibrillation.峰值电流在心室颤动患者转复中的作用。
Singapore Med J. 2017 Jul;58(7):432-437. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2017070.