Dalzell G W, Adgey A A
Regional Medical Cardiology Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Br Heart J. 1991 Jun;65(6):311-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.65.6.311.
To examine factors determining defibrillation success and outcome in patients with ventricular fibrillation.
Observational prospective study of age, sex, transthoracic impedance, site of cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation duration and amplitude, primary or secondary ventricular fibrillation, aetiology, number of shocks to correct ventricular fibrillation, and drug treatment.
A teaching hospital and a mobile coronary care unit with a physician.
70 consecutive patients (50 male, 20 female) mean age 66.5 years.
Before the first countershock was administered transthoracic impedance using a 30 kHz low amplitude AC current passed through 8 cm/12 cm self-adhesive defibrillator electrode pads applied in the anteroapical position was measured. The first two shocks were 200 J delivered energy (low energy) and further shocks of 360 J (high energy) were given if required.
Countershock success and outcome from ventricular fibrillation.
First shock success was significantly greater in inhospital arrests (37/53) than in out-of-hospital arrests (5/17) and in those receiving antiarrhythmic treatment (13/15, 86.7%) v (27/51, 52.9%). Transthoracic impedance was similar in those who were successfully defibrillated with one or two 200 J shocks (98.7 (26) omega) and those who required one or more 360 J shocks (91.4 (23) omega). Success rates with two 200 J shocks were similar in those patients with "high" transthoracic impedance (that is, greater than 115 omega) and those with transthoracic impedance (less than or equal to 115 omega) (8/12 (67%) v 44/58 (76%]. Fine ventricular fibrillation was significantly more common in the patients with a transthoracic impedance of greater than 95 omega (41% (13/32] than in those with a transthoracic impedance less than or equal to 95 omega (13% (5/38]. Death during arrest was significantly more common in patients who needed high energy shocks (14/18 (78%] than in those who needed low energy shocks (16/52 (31%]. Multiple regression analysis identified ventricular fibrillation with an amplitude of greater than or equal to 0.5 mV, age less than or equal to 70 years, and arrests that needed less than or equal to two shocks for defibrillation, in rank order as independent predictors of survival to discharge.
探讨决定心室颤动患者除颤成功及预后的因素。
对年龄、性别、经胸阻抗、心脏骤停部位、心室颤动持续时间及幅度、原发性或继发性心室颤动、病因、纠正心室颤动所需电击次数及药物治疗进行观察性前瞻性研究。
一家教学医院及一个配备医生的移动冠心病监护病房。
连续70例患者(男性50例,女性20例),平均年龄66.5岁。
在首次电击除颤前,使用30kHz低幅度交流电通过置于心尖前位的8cm/12cm自粘除颤电极片测量经胸阻抗。前两次电击能量为200J(低能量),如有需要,后续电击能量为360J(高能量)。
除颤成功及心室颤动的预后。
院内心脏骤停患者首次电击成功的比例(37/53)显著高于院外心脏骤停患者(5/17),接受抗心律失常治疗患者的首次电击成功比例(13/15,86.7%)高于未接受抗心律失常治疗患者(27/51,52.9%)。接受一或两次200J电击成功除颤的患者(98.7(26)Ω)与需要一或多次360J电击的患者(91.4(23)Ω)的经胸阻抗相似。经胸阻抗“高”(即大于115Ω)的患者与经胸阻抗(小于或等于115Ω)的患者接受两次200J电击的成功率相似(8/12(67%)对44/58(76%))。经胸阻抗大于95Ω的患者中细颤型心室颤动明显更常见(41%(13/32)),而经胸阻抗小于或等于95Ω的患者中细颤型心室颤动的比例为13%(5/38)。心脏骤停期间死亡在需要高能量电击的患者中明显更常见(14/18(78%)),而在需要低能量电击的患者中为16/52(31%)。多元回归分析确定,心室颤动幅度大于或等于0.5mV、年龄小于或等于70岁以及除颤所需电击次数小于或等于两次是出院存活的独立预测因素,按重要性排序。