Huysmans M C, Longbottom C, Hintze H, Verdonschot E H
Department of Cariology and Endodontology, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Caries Res. 1998;32(5):330-6. doi: 10.1159/000016468.
Electrical conductance measurements are being used experimentally for occlusal caries detection. Recently, it was suggested to cover the fissure system with a conducting medium, resulting in a surface-specific measurement. It was the aim of this study to determine in vitro the reproducibility of this modified technique for occlusal caries in posterior teeth, to determine for a large study sample the correlation between the electrical measurements and histological lesion depth, and to evaluate the difference between results for premolars and molars. For the reproducibility determination, surface-specific electrical resistance measurements were made using a sample of 68 posterior teeth. Eight operators performed measurements on all teeth, and repeated measurements on 24 teeth. The validity study included the previous sample and the collected samples from two more studies, resulting in a total sample of 325 posterior teeth. One operator had performed electrical resistance measurements on all teeth in the sample. Reproducibility was good: mean Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.89 (+/-0.05) for interexaminer correlation, and 0.86 (+/-0.12) for intra-examiner correlation, using log (resistance) as the result parameter. The correlation coefficient between log(resistance) and histological lesion depth for the large sample was -0.78 for all teeth, -0.64 for premolars, and -0.73 for molars. The regression line for molars was located below the regression line for premolars: at a hypothetical histology score of 2.5 (a dentine caries threshold) the estimated resistance threshold would be 507 kOmega for premolars, and 233 kOmega for molars. Converted to Electronic Caries Monitor (ECM) readings, the difference is about 1.4 on the ECM scale. It was concluded that the in vitro reproducibility of the described surface-specific method for electrical resistance measurement is very good, even for inexperienced operators. The correlation between measurements and histological lesion depth is moderate to good. The method is sensitive to electrode area differences, which will result in different clinical cut-offs for caries diagnosis in premolar and molar teeth.
电导测量正被用于实验性的咬合面龋检测。最近,有人建议用导电介质覆盖裂隙系统,从而实现表面特异性测量。本研究的目的是在体外确定这种改良技术用于后牙咬合面龋的可重复性,为一个大型研究样本确定电学测量值与组织学病变深度之间的相关性,并评估前磨牙和磨牙结果之间的差异。为了确定可重复性,使用68颗后牙样本进行表面特异性电阻测量。8名操作人员对所有牙齿进行测量,并对24颗牙齿进行重复测量。有效性研究包括先前的样本以及另外两项研究收集的样本,最终共有325颗后牙样本。一名操作人员对样本中的所有牙齿进行了电阻测量。可重复性良好:以log(电阻)作为结果参数,检查者间相关性的平均皮尔逊相关系数为0.89(±0.05),检查者内相关性为0.86(±0.12)。大样本中log(电阻)与组织学病变深度之间的相关系数,所有牙齿为-0.78,前磨牙为-0.64,磨牙为-0.73。磨牙的回归线位于前磨牙回归线下方:在假设组织学评分为2.5(牙本质龋阈值)时,前磨牙的估计电阻阈值为507 kΩ,磨牙为233 kΩ。转换为电子龋监测仪(ECM)读数后,在ECM量表上的差异约为1.4。得出的结论是,所描述的表面特异性电阻测量方法在体外的可重复性非常好,即使对于没有经验的操作人员也是如此。测量值与组织学病变深度之间的相关性为中等至良好。该方法对电极面积差异敏感,这将导致前磨牙和磨牙龋诊断的临床截断值不同。