Suppr超能文献

龋齿检测方法:它们能否有助于侵袭性窝沟封闭治疗的决策制定?

Caries detection methods: can they aid decision making for invasive sealant treatment?

作者信息

Pereira A C, Verdonschot E H, Huysmans M C

机构信息

Department of Community Dentistry, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brasil.

出版信息

Caries Res. 2001 Mar-Apr;35(2):83-9. doi: 10.1159/000047437.

Abstract

The decision to place sealants is a difficult one, and it has been suggested that in a low risk population it may be efficient to wait until caries is detected in the fissure. An invasive sealant technique with fissure preparation may then be indicated. The diagnostic method used in the indication of such a procedure should accurately detect both dentine caries and sound fissures: high sensitivity for dentine caries (at D3 threshold) with high specificity for enamel caries (at D1 threshold). The aims of this study were to assess the diagnostic performance of selected diagnostic methods at normal cut-offs for traditional dentine caries detection and at reduced cut-offs in relation to the desired performance mentioned above, and to assess whether fissure opening allows for accurate visual detection of dentinal caries. Data were obtained from 230 occlusal sites of 101 extracted human molar teeth. Diagnostic methods used on the entire sample were: visual inspection, electrical conductance measurements and laser fluorescence measurements. The sample was then divided into two groups. Group 1 was subjected to visual inspection after application of a dye. Group 2 was subjected to visual inspection after fissure opening only, and after subsequent dye application. Validation was performed by histological investigation. The results with cut-offs normally used in dentine caries detection were roughly in accordance with the literature, except for laser fluorescence. The sensitivity of visual inspection for dentinal caries (D3) was 17% before and 70% after fissure opening. Using reduced cut-offs, a 100% sensitivity (D3) was achieved with 2 methods, but this also resulted in 63 or 87% false positive diagnoses of sound surfaces. Visual inspection and electrical methods both showed a moderate to high sensitivity (D3) with a higher than 50% specificity (D1). It was concluded that visual inspection and electrical methods at reduced cut-offs may aid the indication of invasive sealant treatment. The visual detection of dentinal caries is substantially increased, but not perfect after fissure opening.

摘要

决定是否应用窝沟封闭剂是一个难题,有人提出,对于低风险人群,或许等到窝沟中检测到龋齿再进行处理可能更有效。届时可能需要采用一种对窝沟进行预备的侵入性窝沟封闭技术。用于指示该操作的诊断方法应能准确检测出牙本质龋和健康窝沟:对牙本质龋具有高敏感性(在D3阈值),对釉质龋具有高特异性(在D1阈值)。本研究的目的是评估所选诊断方法在传统牙本质龋检测的正常临界值以及相对于上述期望性能的降低临界值时的诊断性能,并评估窝沟开放是否有助于准确肉眼检测牙本质龋。数据来自101颗拔除的人类磨牙的230个咬合面。对整个样本使用的诊断方法有:肉眼检查、电导测量和激光荧光测量。然后将样本分为两组。第1组在应用染料后进行肉眼检查。第2组仅在窝沟开放后以及随后应用染料后进行肉眼检查。通过组织学研究进行验证。除激光荧光外,牙本质龋检测中通常使用的临界值的结果大致与文献一致。肉眼检查对牙本质龋(D3)的敏感性在窝沟开放前为17%,开放后为70%。使用降低的临界值时,两种方法实现了100%的敏感性(D3),但这也导致对健康表面的假阳性诊断率为63%或87%。肉眼检查和电诊断方法均显示出中度至高敏感性(D3),特异性高于50%(D1)。得出的结论是,降低临界值时的肉眼检查和电诊断方法可能有助于指示侵入性窝沟封闭治疗。牙本质龋的肉眼检测在窝沟开放后显著增加,但并不完美。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验