Huysmans M C, Longbottom C, Pitts N
Department of Cariology and Endodontology, University of Nijmegen, The
Caries Res. 1998;32(5):324-9. doi: 10.1159/000016467.
The aim of this study was to compare in vitro diagnostic performance of three electrical methods for occlusal caries diagnosis with that of visual inspection and bite-wing radiography. One hundred and seven extracted molar and premolar teeth were subjected to the diagnostic methods by 2 operators and subsequently sectioned for histological validation. Electrical measurements were made at site level and at surface level using two different instruments. The diagnostic parameters calculated from the results were: sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy at a theoretical caries prevalence of 10% and area under the ROC curve. The electrical methods and bite-wing radiography showed higher sensitivity and lower specificity than visual inspection. Diagnostic accuracy was significantly lower for bite-wing radiography and one electrical method than for visual inspection. Overall diagnostic performance of two electrical methods was superior.
本研究的目的是比较三种用于咬合面龋诊断的电学方法与视觉检查和咬合翼片X线摄影术的体外诊断性能。107颗拔除的磨牙和前磨牙由2名操作人员采用这些诊断方法进行检查,随后进行切片以进行组织学验证。使用两种不同的仪器在部位水平和表面水平进行电学测量。根据结果计算的诊断参数为:灵敏度、特异度、理论龋病患病率为10%时的诊断准确性以及ROC曲线下面积。电学方法和咬合翼片X线摄影术显示出比视觉检查更高的灵敏度和更低的特异度。咬合翼片X线摄影术和一种电学方法的诊断准确性显著低于视觉检查。两种电学方法的总体诊断性能更佳。