Essig M, Hawighorst H, Schoenberg S O, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Fuss M, Debus J, Zuna I, Knopp M V, van Kaick G
Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998 Jul-Aug;8(4):789-98. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880080407.
This study demonstrates the value of a fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) technique in the assessment of primary intraaxial brain tumors. Twenty-one patients with primary intraaxial brain tumors were examined by T2-weighted, proton-density-weighted fast spin echo, fast FLAIR, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted spin echo using identical slice parameters. The images were evaluated using quantitative and qualitative criteria. Quantitative criteria were tumor-to-background and tumor-to-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The qualitative evaluation was performed as a multireader analysis concerning lesion detection, lesion delineation, and image artifacts. In the qualitative evaluation, all readers found the fast FLAIR to be superior to fast spin echo in the exact delineation of intraaxial brain tumors (P < .001) and the delineation of enhancing and nonenhancing tumor parts. Fast FLAIR was superior in the delineation of cortically located and small lesions but was limited in lesions adjacent to the ventricles. Fast FLAIR provided a significantly better tumor-to-CSF contrast and tumor-to-CSF CNR (P < .001). The tumor-to-background contrast and tumor-to-background CNR of the fast FLAIR images were lower than those of T2-weighted spin-echo images but higher than those of proton-density-weighted spin-echo images. FLAIR images had more image artifacts influencing the image interpretation in only two patients. Signal hyperintensities at the ventricular border were present in 92% of the patients. They are common findings in fast FLAIR and should be included into the image interpretation.
本研究证明了快速液体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)技术在评估原发性脑内肿瘤中的价值。对21例原发性脑内肿瘤患者使用相同的层面参数,通过T2加权、质子密度加权快速自旋回波、快速FLAIR以及对比增强T1加权自旋回波进行检查。采用定量和定性标准对图像进行评估。定量标准为肿瘤与背景、肿瘤与脑脊液(CSF)的对比以及对比噪声比(CNR)。定性评估采用多阅片者分析,涉及病变检测、病变勾勒和图像伪影。在定性评估中,所有阅片者均发现快速FLAIR在精确勾勒脑内肿瘤(P <.001)以及勾勒强化和非强化肿瘤部分方面优于快速自旋回波。快速FLAIR在勾勒皮质定位和小病变方面更具优势,但在脑室附近的病变中存在局限性。快速FLAIR提供了显著更好的肿瘤与脑脊液对比以及肿瘤与脑脊液CNR(P <.001)。快速FLAIR图像的肿瘤与背景对比以及肿瘤与背景CNR低于T2加权自旋回波图像,但高于质子密度加权自旋回波图像。仅在两名患者中,FLAIR图像存在更多影响图像解读的图像伪影。92%的患者在脑室边界处出现信号高强化。它们是快速FLAIR中的常见表现,应纳入图像解读。