Shulman G, Solanki D R, Hadjipavlou A
Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-0717, USA.
J Clin Apher. 1998;13(2):62-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1101(1998)13:2<62::aid-jca3>3.0.co;2-6.
Intraoperative autologous transfusion during major reconstructive spine surgery decreased allogeneic red blood cell transfusions, but patients were exposed to significant numbers of allogeneic blood products. This study reports a prospective study of 160 randomized patients undergoing major reconstructive spine surgery. Without delaying start of surgery, 80 patients underwent hemapheresis with coincidental normovolemic hemodilution in the operating room to sequester autologous blood components. A therapeutic dose plateletpheresis product and an average of 2 U each of freshly collected autologous red cells and fresh plasma were prepared prior to surgical incision. The same supplies and equipment were used subsequently to carry out intraoperative autologous transfusion (IAT). Autologous plasma and platelets were transfused to Sequestration patients, contributing to a significant decrease of total allogeneic donor exposures. One or more autologous red blood cell unit equivalents were cost effectively salvaged and retransfused to 78% of the Sequestration patients. Altogether, autologous red cells comprised 87% of the total red cells transfused. During the same time period, 80 age-, sex-, and weight-matched controls, who received IAT only, were accrued for comparison with Sequestration patients. Of all red cells transfused to control patients, autologous units comprised 47%. Both patient groups received the same total perioperative red blood cell support. The per patient cost for IAT, with or without sequestration, was competitive with supplying one unit of cross-matched allogeneic red cells. IAT only patients had greater allogeneic blood donor exposures than Sequestration patients, in whom the numbers of allogeneic red cells, plasma and platelet transfusions were decreased. Compared with IAT alone, the hospital post-operative stay of Sequestration patients was 23% less than IAT only patients.
在脊柱重建大手术中,术中自体输血减少了异体红细胞输注,但患者仍接触了大量异体血液制品。本研究报告了一项对160例接受脊柱重建大手术的随机患者的前瞻性研究。在不延迟手术开始的情况下,80例患者在手术室进行血液成分单采并同时进行等容血液稀释,以采集自体血液成分。在手术切口前制备了治疗剂量的血小板单采制品以及平均各2单位的新鲜采集的自体红细胞和新鲜血浆。随后使用相同的耗材和设备进行术中自体输血(IAT)。将自体血浆和血小板输给血液成分单采患者,这显著减少了异体供体的总接触量。78%的血液成分单采患者以具有成本效益的方式回收并回输了一个或多个自体红细胞单位当量。总体而言,自体红细胞占输注红细胞总量的87%。在同一时期,招募了80例年龄、性别和体重匹配的对照患者,他们仅接受术中自体输血,用于与血液成分单采患者进行比较。在输给对照患者的所有红细胞中,自体单位占47%。两组患者接受的围手术期红细胞总支持量相同。无论有无血液成分单采,术中自体输血的人均成本与供应1单位交叉配型的异体红细胞具有竞争力。仅接受术中自体输血的患者比血液成分单采患者有更多的异体献血者接触,血液成分单采患者的异体红细胞、血浆和血小板输注量减少。与仅接受术中自体输血相比,血液成分单采患者的术后住院时间比仅接受术中自体输血的患者少23%。