Merrill D C, Goodwin P, Burson J M, Sato Y, Williamson R, Weiner C P
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jul;179(1):235-40. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70278-9.
It has been proposed that cesarean section improves the long-term neurologic outcome of children with meningomyelocele. On the basis of this belief, a trial of labor is not offered in many centers. We hypothesized that there is no difference in immediate or long-term outcome by route of delivery for the fetus with meningomyelocele delivered in a tertiary care center.
All fetuses (n = 60) with meningomyelocele delivered at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics between 1971 and 1995 were analyzed. Thirty-six cases were available for long-term follow-up. Motor, sensory, and anatomic levels were converted to a numeric scale. Variables were compared by one-way analysis of variance, chi2 analysis, and Fisher's exact test with significance at P < .05.
There were no significant differences by route of delivery for gestational age of delivery, birth weight, meningomyelocele size, or neonatal mortality (vaginal: 1/22 = 4.5%, cesarean section: 2/17 = 11.8%, P = .82). An antenatal diagnosis was made with similar frequency in the two groups (vaginal: 15/21 = 71.4%, cesarean section: 13/15 = 86.7%). In addition, the length of long-term follow-up was similar (vaginal: 54.7 +/- 11.1 months, cesarean section: 33.7 +/- 8.6 months). There was no difference in long-term neurologic outcome as determined by the change in motor level, the change in sensory level, or when comparing the final motor level with the anatomic level.
This study was unable to detect differences between either immediate or long-term outcome for the infant with isolated meningomyelocele when stratified by route of delivery. A multicenter randomized trial should be required before the acceptance of cesarean section as the optimal route of delivery for the fetus with meningomyelocele.
