Holland P
Department of Psychology: Experimental, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0086, USA.
Neuropharmacology. 1998 Apr-May;37(4-5):461-9. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(98)00038-0.
The effects of variations in the amount of training on behavioral plasticity were examined in three experiments that used appetitive Pavlovian conditioning procedures with rats. In experiments 1 and 2, an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) substituted for a food unconditioned stimulus (US) in the acquisition of new learning about the food US after small numbers of CS-US pairings, but not after larger numbers of pairings. After limited exposure to the relation between the auditory CS and food, pairings of the CS with the toxin LiCl, in the absence of food, were sufficient to establish an aversion to the food US that was previously paired with that CS. This CS-mediated learning did not occur after more extensive exposure to the CS-food relation. In contrast, in experiment 3. mediated performance of previously-established conditioned responding was unaffected by the number of CS-US pairings used to establish that performance. Conditioned responding to the auditory CS remained sensitive to post-training devaluation of the food US regardless of the amount of initial CS-US training. Implications of these results for the investigations of cortical and other brain mechanisms of behavioral plasticity are discussed.
在三项实验中,研究人员利用对大鼠进行的经典性条件反射训练程序,考察了训练量的变化对行为可塑性的影响。在实验1和实验2中,在少量条件刺激(CS)与非条件刺激(US)配对后,在获取关于食物非条件刺激的新学习过程中,听觉条件刺激替代了食物非条件刺激,但在大量配对后则不然。在有限接触听觉条件刺激与食物之间的关系后,在没有食物的情况下,将条件刺激与毒素氯化锂配对,足以建立对先前与该条件刺激配对的食物非条件刺激的厌恶。在更广泛接触条件刺激与食物的关系后,这种由条件刺激介导的学习并未发生。相比之下,在实验3中,先前建立的条件反应的介导表现不受用于建立该表现的条件刺激与非条件刺激配对数量的影响。无论最初的条件刺激与非条件刺激训练量如何,对听觉条件刺激的条件反应对训练后食物非条件刺激的贬值仍保持敏感。本文讨论了这些结果对行为可塑性的皮层及其他脑机制研究的意义。