Middlebrooks J C, Xu L, Eddins A C, Green D M
Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Aug;80(2):863-81. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.2.863.
We evaluated two hypothetical codes for sound-source location in the auditory cortex. The topographical code assumed that single neurons are selective for particular locations and that sound-source locations are coded by the cortical location of small populations of maximally activated neurons. The distributed code assumed that the responses of individual neurons can carry information about locations throughout 360 degrees of azimuth and that accurate sound localization derives from information that is distributed across large populations of such panoramic neurons. We recorded from single units in the anterior ectosylvian sulcus area (area AES) and in area A2 of alpha-chloralose-anesthetized cats. Results obtained in the two areas were essentially equivalent. Noise bursts were presented from loudspeakers spaced in 20 degrees intervals of azimuth throughout 360 degrees of the horizontal plane. Spike counts of the majority of units were modulated >50% by changes in sound-source azimuth. Nevertheless, sound-source locations that produced greater than half-maximal spike counts often spanned >180 degrees of azimuth. The spatial selectivity of units tended to broaden and, often, to shift in azimuth as sound pressure levels (SPLs) were increased to a moderate level. We sometimes saw systematic changes in spatial tuning along segments of electrode tracks as long as 1.5 mm but such progressions were not evident at higher sound levels. Moderate-level sounds presented anywhere in the contralateral hemifield produced greater than half-maximal activation of nearly all units. These results are not consistent with the hypothesis of a topographic code. We used an artificial-neural-network algorithm to recognize spike patterns and, thereby, infer the locations of sound sources. Network input consisted of spike density functions formed by averages of responses to eight stimulus repetitions. Information carried in the responses of single units permitted reasonable estimates of sound-source locations throughout 360 degrees of azimuth. The most accurate units exhibited median errors in localization of <25 degrees, meaning that the network output fell within 25 degrees of the correct location on half of the trials. Spike patterns tended to vary with stimulus SPL, but level-invariant features of patterns permitted estimates of locations of sound sources that varied through 20-dB ranges. Sound localization based on spike patterns that preserved details of spike timing consistently was more accurate than localization based on spike counts alone. These results support the hypothesis that sound-source locations are represented by a distributed code and that individual neurons are, in effect, panoramic localizers.
我们评估了听觉皮层中两种用于声源定位的假设编码。地形编码假设单个神经元对特定位置具有选择性,并且声源位置由最大激活的小群神经元的皮层位置编码。分布式编码假设单个神经元的反应可以携带关于360度方位角范围内位置的信息,并且精确的声音定位来自分布在大量此类全景神经元群体中的信息。我们在α-氯醛糖麻醉猫的前外侧沟区域(AES区域)和A2区域记录单个神经元的活动。在这两个区域获得的结果基本相同。在水平平面360度范围内,扬声器以20度方位角间隔排列并发出噪声脉冲。大多数神经元的放电计数受声源方位角变化的调制超过50%。然而,产生大于半数最大放电计数的声源位置通常跨越超过180度的方位角。随着声压级(SPL)增加到中等水平,神经元的空间选择性趋于变宽,并且在方位角上经常发生偏移。我们有时会看到沿长达1.5毫米的电极轨迹段的空间调谐有系统变化,但在较高声级下这种进展并不明显。对侧半视野中任何位置呈现的中等水平声音会使几乎所有神经元产生大于半数最大激活。这些结果与地形编码的假设不一致。我们使用人工神经网络算法识别放电模式,从而推断声源位置。网络输入由对八个刺激重复的反应平均值形成的放电密度函数组成。单个神经元反应中携带的信息允许对方位角360度范围内的声源位置进行合理估计。最精确的神经元在定位中的中值误差小于25度,这意味着在一半的试验中网络输出落在正确位置的25度范围内。放电模式往往随刺激声压级而变化,但模式的电平不变特征允许对方位角变化20分贝范围内的声源位置进行估计。基于始终保留放电时间细节的放电模式的声音定位比仅基于放电计数的定位更准确。这些结果支持以下假设:声源位置由分布式编码表示,并且单个神经元实际上是全景定位器。