• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童颅内室管膜瘤的预后因素:年龄和肿瘤位置的作用。

Prognostic factors in childhood intracranial ependymomas: the role of age and tumor location.

作者信息

Sala F, Talacchi A, Mazza C, Prisco R, Ghimenton C, Bricolo A

机构信息

Department of Neurologic and Vision Sciences, Section of Neurosurgery, University of Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Pediatr Neurosurg. 1998 Mar;28(3):135-42. doi: 10.1159/000028637.

DOI:10.1159/000028637
PMID:9705591
Abstract

Despite several clinical reports on intracranial ependymomas in children, the factors which affect prognosis, and the possibility that certain combinations of factors might limit survival, are still a matter of debate. Between 1976 and 1996 we operated on 35 children with intracranial ependymomas. Postoperative irradiation was given to 27 patients, with associated chemotherapy in 6 cases. Mean follow-up was 62 months. In 12 patients a 5-year follow-up was possible. In October 1996, 18 patients (51.4%) were still alive, the longest disease-free follow-up being 20 years, and the shortest 8 months. We analyzed the prognostic relevance of eight factors. For each factor, different subgroups were distinguished and compared as follows: age at diagnosis (<4 vs. >/=4 years), sex, tumor location (supratentorial vs. infratentorial), tumor size (<4 vs. 4-7 vs. >7 cm), surgical removal (total vs. subtotal), histology (low-grade vs. anaplastic), morphology (solid vs. cystic), adjuvant therapies (treatment vs. no treatment). Two-way contingency tables were made to identify associations between variables. The only significant association was between age and tumor location (p = 0.022): in children under 4, tumors were almost invariably located in the posterior fossa (9 out of 10 cases) with a clear preference for the lateral recess (8 cases). Other correlations were not significant. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared to assess the prognostic relevance of each factor. Survival was significantly lower for children under 4, for those with posterior fossa tumors, and for patients with residual tumor (p < 0.05). A multivariate analysis compared variables which significantly affected survival, revealing that age is the most important factor affecting prognosis (p < 0.05), while tumor location and surgical removal do not add any significance to the effect of age on survival. We conclude that age has the strongest prognostic relevance in childhood intracranial ependymomas, while the effect of tumor location on survival may be related to the high incidence of lateral recess ependymomas in younger children.

摘要

尽管已有多篇关于儿童颅内室管膜瘤的临床报告,但影响预后的因素以及某些因素组合可能限制生存的可能性仍存在争议。1976年至1996年间,我们为35例儿童颅内室管膜瘤患者实施了手术。27例患者术后接受了放疗,其中6例联合化疗。平均随访时间为62个月。12例患者获得了5年随访。1996年10月,18例患者(51.4%)仍存活,无病生存期最长为20年,最短为8个月。我们分析了8个因素与预后的相关性。对于每个因素,区分并比较了不同亚组,具体如下:诊断时年龄(<4岁与≥4岁)、性别、肿瘤位置(幕上与幕下)、肿瘤大小(<4 cm与4 - 7 cm与>7 cm)、手术切除程度(全切与次全切)、组织学类型(低级别与间变性)、形态(实性与囊性)、辅助治疗(接受治疗与未接受治疗)。制作双向列联表以确定变量之间的关联。唯一显著的关联是年龄与肿瘤位置之间的关联(p = 0.022):4岁以下儿童的肿瘤几乎都位于后颅窝(10例中有9例),尤其倾向于外侧隐窝(8例)。其他相关性不显著。比较Kaplan - Meier生存曲线以评估每个因素与预后的相关性。4岁以下儿童、后颅窝肿瘤患者以及有残留肿瘤的患者生存率显著较低(p < 0.05)。多因素分析比较了显著影响生存的变量,结果显示年龄是影响预后的最重要因素(p < 0.05),而肿瘤位置和手术切除程度对年龄对生存的影响没有额外的显著作用。我们得出结论,年龄在儿童颅内室管膜瘤的预后相关性中最为显著,而肿瘤位置对生存的影响可能与年幼儿童中外侧隐窝室管膜瘤的高发病率有关。

相似文献

1
Prognostic factors in childhood intracranial ependymomas: the role of age and tumor location.儿童颅内室管膜瘤的预后因素:年龄和肿瘤位置的作用。
Pediatr Neurosurg. 1998 Mar;28(3):135-42. doi: 10.1159/000028637.
2
[Therapeutic results of eight patients with intracranial ependymomas].[8例颅内室管膜瘤的治疗结果]
No To Shinkei. 2003 Mar;55(3):233-40.
3
Prognostic factors in intracranial ependymomas in children.儿童颅内室管膜瘤的预后因素
J Neurosurg. 2000 Oct;93(4):605-13. doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.4.0605.
4
Supratentorial hemispheric ependymomas: an analysis of 109 adults for survival and prognostic factors.幕上脑半球室管膜瘤:109 例成人患者的生存分析及预后因素。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Aug;125(2):410-8. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.JNS151187. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
5
Treatment and survival of supratentorial and posterior fossa ependymomas in adults.成人幕上和后颅窝室管膜瘤的治疗与生存情况
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Jun;28:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.11.014. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
6
The importance of surgery in supratentorial ependymomas. Long-term survival in a series of 23 cases.手术在幕上室管膜瘤中的重要性。23例患者的长期生存情况。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2000 Mar;16(3):170-5. doi: 10.1007/s003810050487.
7
Intracranial ependymomas: prognostic aspects.颅内室管膜瘤:预后相关因素
Neurosurg Rev. 1989;12(2):157-63. doi: 10.1007/BF01741491.
8
Prognosis by tumor location in adults with intracranial ependymomas.颅内室管膜瘤成人患者肿瘤位置的预后情况
J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Dec;21(12):2096-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.05.011. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
9
Supratentorial ependymomas in childhood: clinicopathological findings and prognosis.儿童幕上室管膜瘤:临床病理特征与预后
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991;111(3-4):96-102. doi: 10.1007/BF01400495.
10
Supratentorial ependymomas in adult patients.成年患者的幕上室管膜瘤
Neurosurgery. 1999 Apr;44(4):721-31. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199904000-00018.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Implications of Histological Clear Cells in High-Grade Intracranial Ependymal Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis from a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan.高级别颅内室管膜瘤中组织学透明细胞的预后意义:来自巴基斯坦一家三级护理医院的回顾性分析
Asian J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr-Jun;13(2):307-313. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_280_16.
2
Quantitative imaging analysis of posterior fossa ependymoma location in children.儿童后颅窝室管膜瘤位置的定量成像分析
Childs Nerv Syst. 2016 Aug;32(8):1441-7. doi: 10.1007/s00381-016-3092-4. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
3
Evaluation of chromosome 1q gain in intracranial ependymomas.
颅内室管膜瘤中1号染色体q臂增加的评估。
J Neurooncol. 2016 Apr;127(2):271-8. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-2047-z. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
4
Understanding Ependymoma Oncogenesis: an Update on Recent Molecular Advances and Current Perspectives.了解室管膜瘤的肿瘤发生:近期分子进展及当前观点的最新情况
Mol Neurobiol. 2017 Jan;54(1):15-21. doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9646-8. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
5
Ependymoma in children: molecular considerations and therapeutic insights.儿童室管膜瘤:分子学考虑与治疗新视角。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2013 Oct;15(10):759-65. doi: 10.1007/s12094-013-1041-1. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
6
Tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for anaplastic ependymoma in children younger than 3 years of age.儿童 3 岁以下间变性室管膜瘤的串联大剂量化疗和自体造血干细胞移植。
J Neurooncol. 2012 Apr;107(2):335-42. doi: 10.1007/s11060-011-0745-8. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
7
Intracranial ependymomas treated with radiotherapy: long-term results from a single institution.颅内室管膜瘤的放射治疗:单机构的长期结果。
J Neurooncol. 2011 May;102(3):451-7. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0344-0. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
8
Posterior fossa ependymomas: new radiological classification with surgical correlation.后颅窝室管膜瘤:具有手术相关性的新影像学分类
Childs Nerv Syst. 2010 Dec;26(12):1765-72. doi: 10.1007/s00381-010-1251-6. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
9
Neuronal differentiation distinguishes supratentorial and infratentorial childhood ependymomas.神经元分化区分幕上和幕下儿童室管膜瘤。
Neuro Oncol. 2010 Nov;12(11):1126-34. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noq074. Epub 2010 Jul 8.
10
The history of ependymoma management.室管膜瘤治疗的历史。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2009 Oct;25(10):1167-83. doi: 10.1007/s00381-009-0900-0. Epub 2009 May 21.