Birnbaum MH, Zimmermann JM
Fullerton and Institute for Mathematical Behavioral Sciences, California State University, Irvine
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998 May;74(2):145-87. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2774.
Judges evaluated buying and selling prices of hypothetical investments, based on the previous price of each investment and estimates of the investment's future value given by advisors of varied expertise. Effect of a source's estimate varied in proportion to the source's expertise, and it varied inversely with the number and expertise of other sources. There was also a configural effect in which the effect of a source's estimate was affected by the rank order of that source's estimate, in relation to other estimates of the same investment. These interactions were fit with a configural weight averaging model in which buyers and sellers place different weights on estimates of different ranks. This model implies that one can design a new experiment in which there will be different violations of joint independence in different viewpoints. Experiment 2 confirmed patterns of violations of joint independence predicted from the model fit in Experiment 1. Experiment 2 also showed that preference reversals between viewpoints can be predicted by the model of Experiment 1. Configural weighting provides a better account of buying and selling prices than either of two models of loss aversion or the theory of anchoring and insufficient adjustment. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.
法官们根据每项投资的先前价格以及不同专业的顾问给出的投资未来价值估计,对假设投资的买卖价格进行评估。一个信息源估计的影响与该信息源的专业程度成正比,且与其他信息源的数量和专业程度成反比。还存在一种构型效应,即一个信息源估计的影响会受到该信息源估计相对于同一投资的其他估计的排序的影响。这些相互作用符合一种构型权重平均模型,在该模型中,买卖双方对不同排序的估计赋予不同的权重。该模型意味着可以设计一个新的实验,在不同观点中会出现不同的联合独立性违背情况。实验2证实了从实验1的模型拟合中预测出的联合独立性违背模式。实验2还表明,观点之间的偏好逆转可以由实验1的模型预测。构型加权比两种损失厌恶模型或锚定与调整不足理论中的任何一种都能更好地解释买卖价格。版权所有1998年学术出版社。