• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

决策场理论:一种在不确定环境中进行决策的动态认知方法。

Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.

作者信息

Busemeyer J R, Townsend J T

机构信息

Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1364.

出版信息

Psychol Rev. 1993 Jul;100(3):432-59. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.432.

DOI:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.432
PMID:8356185
Abstract

Decision field theory provides for a mathematical foundation leading to a dynamic, stochastic theory of decision behavior in an uncertain environment. This theory is used to explain (a) violations of stochastic dominance, (b) violations of strong stochastic transitivity, (c) violations of independence between alternatives, (d) serial position effects on preference, (e) speed-accuracy trade-off effects in decision making, (f) the inverse relation between choice probability and decision time, (g) changes in the direction of preference under time pressure, (h) slower decision times for avoidance as compared with approach conflicts, and (i) preference reversals between choice and selling price measures of preference. The proposed theory is compared with 4 other theories of decision making under uncertainty.

摘要

决策场理论为在不确定环境中形成动态随机决策行为理论提供了数学基础。该理论用于解释:(a)违反随机占优原则的情况;(b)违反强随机传递性的情况;(c)备选方案之间独立性的违反情况;(d)偏好的序列位置效应;(e)决策过程中的速度 - 准确性权衡效应;(f)选择概率与决策时间之间的反比关系;(g)时间压力下偏好方向的变化;(h)与趋近冲突相比,回避冲突时决策时间更长的情况;以及(i)偏好的选择和售卖价格度量之间的偏好逆转。将所提出的理论与其他4种不确定性条件下的决策理论进行了比较。

相似文献

1
Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment.决策场理论:一种在不确定环境中进行决策的动态认知方法。
Psychol Rev. 1993 Jul;100(3):432-59. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.432.
2
Stochastic representation decision theory: How probabilities and values are entangled dual characteristics in cognitive processes.随机表示决策理论:概率和价值如何在认知过程中纠缠为双重特征。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 14;15(12):e0243661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243661. eCollection 2020.
3
MDFT account of decision making under time pressure.时间压力下决策的多维度功能理论解释
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Mar;10(1):157-66. doi: 10.3758/bf03196480.
4
Evidence against Rank-Dependent Utility Theories: Tests of Cumulative Independence, Interval Independence, Stochastic Dominance, and Transitivity.反对等级依赖效用理论的证据:累积独立性、区间独立性、随机占优和可传递性的检验。
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1999 Jan;77(1):44-83. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2816.
5
Making trade-offs: a probabilistic and context-sensitive model of choice behavior.权衡取舍:一种选择行为的概率性和情境敏感模型。
Psychol Rev. 2002 Jan;109(1):137-55. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.109.1.137.
6
Transitivity of preferences.偏好的传递性。
Psychol Rev. 2011 Jan;118(1):42-56. doi: 10.1037/a0021150.
7
Building bridges between neural models and complex decision making behaviour.搭建神经模型与复杂决策行为之间的桥梁。
Neural Netw. 2006 Oct;19(8):1047-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.05.043. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
8
Do violations of the axioms of expected utility theory threaten decision analysis?违反预期效用理论的公理是否会威胁到决策分析?
Med Decis Making. 1996 Oct-Dec;16(4):399-403. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9601600410.
9
Using the Reliability Theory for Assessing the Decision Confidence Probability for Comparative Life Cycle Assessments.运用可靠性理论评估比较生命周期评估决策置信概率。
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Mar 1;50(5):2272-80. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03683. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
10
Quantum stochastic walks on networks for decision-making.网络上的量子随机游走用于决策。
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 31;6:23812. doi: 10.1038/srep23812.

引用本文的文献

1
Impulsive Decision Reduction Training for Youth (IDRT-Y) to Promote Adaptive Decision-Making: Results from a Pilot Trial.青少年冲动决策减少训练(IDRT-Y)促进适应性决策:一项试点试验的结果
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1007/s10578-025-01898-0.
2
A Novel Approach-Avoidance Task to Study Decision Making Under Outcome Uncertainty.一种用于研究结果不确定性下决策的新颖趋避任务。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 17:2025.07.12.663075. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.12.663075.
3
Cautionary response strategy and impairment of post-conflict response selection underlie age-related differences in a location-based Stroop task.
在基于位置的Stroop任务中,年龄相关差异的基础是警示反应策略和冲突后反应选择的受损。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 21;16:1565846. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1565846. eCollection 2025.
4
Impulsive Decision Reduction Training (IDRT) reduces binge drinking and increases future orientation in young adult binge drinkers.冲动决策减少训练(IDRT)可减少年轻成年酗酒者的酗酒行为,并增强其未来导向性。
Addict Behav. 2025 Nov;170:108443. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108443. Epub 2025 Jul 23.
5
Predicting human decisions with behavioural theories and machine learning.运用行为理论和机器学习预测人类决策。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02267-6.
6
Experience-based risk taking is primarily shaped by prior learning rather than by decision-making.基于经验的冒险行为主要由先前的学习塑造,而非决策过程。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 9;16(1):6310. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61609-0.
7
Ambiguity preferences in intertemporal and risky choice: A large-scale study using drift-diffusion modelling.跨期与风险选择中的模糊性偏好:一项使用漂移扩散模型的大规模研究。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02709-2.
8
Crosstalk between delayed and immediate subjective evaluation tasks.延迟与即时主观评估任务之间的相互影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 5;15(1):19784. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04828-1.
9
Preference reversals in ethicality judgments of medical treatments.医疗治疗伦理判断中的偏好逆转
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 29;20(4):e0319233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319233. eCollection 2025.
10
Adult age differences in the integration of values for self and other.成人在自我与他人价值观整合方面的年龄差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 14;15(1):12776. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96656-6.