Lie T, Bruun G, Böe O E
Department of Odontology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Bergen, Norway.
J Periodontol. 1998 Jul;69(7):819-27. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.7.819.
The present study was performed to assess and compare the clinical healing and the microbiological findings following local application of metronidazole or tetracycline to augment subgingival scaling in previously untreated adult periodontitis sites. Eighteen patients with moderate to severe adult periodontitis at single-rooted teeth were selected. In each patient, 3 interproximal sites having comparable root anatomy, probing depth > or =5 mm and bleeding on probing were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: 1) two sessions of subgingival scaling and root planing; 2) similar to 1, with each treatment supplemented with a 25% metronidazole sustained release gel; 3) similar to 1 with each treatment supplemented with a 3% tetracycline ointment. The treatments were performed by 1 operator and the clinical variables probing depth, attachment level, and bleeding on probing were evaluated at baseline, 3 months and 6 months by a second blinded examiner. The microbiological findings were evaluated using a commercial test kit. The average probing depth reduction for the 3 groups at 6 months was 1.5 mm and the average gain of clinical attachment was 0.8 mm. There were no significant differences between the effects following topical application of the metronidazole gel or the tetracycline ointment. Scaling and root planing alone appeared as effective as the drug augmented regimens, although there was a weak but non-significant tendency for better results in sites treated with the antibiotic drugs. Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans was generally not detected; Prevotella intermedia was not significantly reduced, while Porphyromonas gingivalis was significantly reduced in all treatment groups. It was concluded that the augmentative effect of the metronidazole gel and the tetracycline ointment was comparable but small compared to scaling and root planing alone. The clinical importance of such small augmentation effects should be further evaluated.
本研究旨在评估和比较在未经治疗的成人牙周炎部位局部应用甲硝唑或四环素以增强龈下刮治后的临床愈合情况和微生物学检查结果。选取了18例单根牙患有中度至重度成人牙周炎的患者。在每位患者中,将3个具有相似牙根解剖结构、探诊深度≥5mm且探诊出血的邻间隙部位随机分配至3个治疗组中的1组:1)进行两次龈下刮治和根面平整;2)与1组类似,但每次治疗补充25%甲硝唑缓释凝胶;3)与1组类似,但每次治疗补充3%四环素软膏。治疗由1名操作人员进行,临床变量探诊深度、附着水平和探诊出血情况在基线、3个月和6个月时由另一名盲法检查者进行评估。微生物学检查结果使用商用检测试剂盒进行评估。6个月时3组的平均探诊深度减少量为1.5mm,临床附着平均增加量为0.8mm。局部应用甲硝唑凝胶或四环素软膏后的效果之间无显著差异。单独的刮治和根面平整似乎与药物增强治疗方案一样有效,尽管在用抗生素药物治疗的部位有微弱但不显著的更好结果的趋势。伴放线放线杆菌通常未被检测到;中间普氏菌未显著减少,而牙龈卟啉单胞菌在所有治疗组中均显著减少。得出的结论是,甲硝唑凝胶和四环素软膏的增强作用相当,但与单独的刮治和根面平整相比作用较小。这种微小增强作用的临床重要性应进一步评估。