Shiloah J, Patters M R
Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee, Memphis, USA.
J Periodontol. 1996 Feb;67(2):130-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.1996.67.2.130.
This clinical study evaluated the reinfection incidence by Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg), and Prevotella intermedia (Pi) in periodontal pockets following scaling and root planing (SRP) and intra-pocket irrigation with antimicrobial agents in a patient population who did not receive supportive maintenance therapy. The number of target organisms was determined utilizing DNA probes. Forty-one (41) inflamed pockets > or = 5 mm with attachment loss and containing at least one target species were selected in 6 adult patients. Following a baseline clinical and bacterial examination, all patients received thorough SRP. In addition, 1 to 2 teeth in each patient were randomly assigned to each of the following 4 treatment modalities: 1) control group, no irrigation; 2) saline group, irrigation with 2 cc of 0.85% saline; 3) tetracycline group, irrigation with 2 cc of aqueous tetracycline HCl, 50 mg/ml (5%); and 4) chlorhexidine group, irrigation with 2 cc, respectively. All selected sites were non-adjacent. No additional therapy was rendered during the entire 1-year observation period. Clinical parameters and microbial analyses were recorded again at 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment. The effect of antimicrobial irrigation on the reinfection rate of sites by Aa, Pg, and Pi was compared with that of the control groups (1 and 2) by ANOVA. No statistically significant differences were observed among the irrigation treatment groups with regard to any of the clinical or bacterial parameters studied. Therefore, the 4 treatment groups were combined into a single group whereby the rate of bacterial repopulation following extensive scaling and root planing could be ascertained. The infection incidence of sites at baseline (of total sites), 1 week and 12 months (of sites originally infected at baseline) was 14/41, 3/14, and 7/14 for Aa; 33/41, 6/33, and 12/33 for Pg; and 37/41, 3/37, and 12/37 for Pi, respectively. Thus, half or fewer of the originally infected sites became reinfected at 12 months despite lack of maintenance therapy. The results suggest that 1) a single episode of pocket irrigation with antimicrobial agents following thorough scaling and root planing did not affect the rate of repopulation of periodontal pockets by the tested pathogens; 2) thorough scaling and root planing has a lasting suppressive effect on selected periodontal pathogens for the majority of sites in patients with adult periodontitis; 3) pre-operative probing depth, the amount of gingival fluid flow and the composition of the subgingival microflora may serve as predictors for reinfection in the absence of maintenance care; and 4) reinfection of the treated sites by Aa, Pg, and/or Pi may constitute a risk factor that diminishes the effect of therapy in the absence of supportive maintenance care.
本临床研究评估了在未接受支持性维护治疗的患者群体中,龈下刮治术和根面平整术(SRP)以及用抗菌剂进行袋内冲洗后,伴放线放线杆菌(Aa)、牙龈卟啉单胞菌(Pg)和中间普氏菌(Pi)在牙周袋中的再感染发生率。使用DNA探针确定目标微生物的数量。在6名成年患者中选择了41个附着丧失且深度≥5mm、有炎症且至少含有一种目标菌种的牙周袋。在进行基线临床和细菌学检查后,所有患者均接受了彻底的龈下刮治术和根面平整术。此外,将每位患者的1至2颗牙齿随机分配至以下4种治疗方式中的每一种:1)对照组,不冲洗;2)盐水组,用2cc 0.85%的盐水冲洗;3)四环素组,用2cc盐酸四环素水溶液(50mg/ml,即5%)冲洗;4)氯己定组,分别用2cc冲洗。所有选定部位均不相邻。在整个1年的观察期内未进行额外治疗。在治疗后1周、1、3、6、9和12个月时再次记录临床参数和微生物分析结果。通过方差分析将抗菌冲洗对Aa、Pg和Pi所致部位再感染率的影响与对照组(1和2)进行比较。在所研究的任何临床或细菌学参数方面,冲洗治疗组之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。因此,将这4个治疗组合并为一个组,从而可以确定广泛龈下刮治术和根面平整术后细菌再定植的发生率。Aa在基线时(所有部位)、1周和12个月时(基线时最初感染的部位)的感染发生率分别为14/41、3/14和7/14;Pg分别为33/41、6/33和12/33;Pi分别为37/41、3/37和12/37。因此,尽管缺乏维护治疗,但在12个月时,最初感染部位中有一半或更少的部位发生了再感染。结果表明:1)在彻底的龈下刮治术和根面平整术后,单次用抗菌剂进行袋内冲洗不会影响受试病原体在牙周袋中的再定植率;2)彻底的龈下刮治术和根面平整术对成人牙周炎患者的大多数部位的选定牙周病原体具有持久的抑制作用;3)术前探诊深度、龈沟液流量以及龈下微生物群落组成可作为在缺乏维护治疗时再感染的预测指标;4)Aa、Pg和/或Pi对治疗部位的再感染可能构成一个危险因素,在缺乏支持性维护治疗的情况下会降低治疗效果。