Van Elstraete A C, Mamie J C, Mehdaoui H
Department of Anesthesiology, Saint-Paul Medical Center, Fort-de-France, Martinique, France.
Anesth Analg. 1998 Aug;87(2):400-2. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199808000-00031.
Tracheal intubation may pose problems in patients with cervical spine injury (CSI). In patients without CSI, the success rate of blind nasotracheal intubation is increased by endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff inflation in the pharynx. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of ETT cuff inflation in the pharynx as an aid to blind nasotracheal intubation in patients with an immobilized cervical spine. The technique was compared with fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Twenty ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing elective surgery in which the trachea was to be intubated nasally were enrolled in this prospective, randomized study. The cervical spine of each patient was immobilized. The trachea of each patient was intubated twice, once using fiberoptic bronchoscopy and once blindly using the technique of ETT cuff inflation in the pharynx. A maximum of three attempts was allowed for intubation using ETT cuff inflation. A maximum of 3 min was allowed for intubation using fiberoptic bronchoscopy. When ETT cuff inflation was used, intubation was successful in 19 of 20 patients (95%); the first attempt at intubation was successful in 14 of 20 patients (70%). Intubation was successful in 19 of 20 patients (95%) when using fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Mean times to intubate were 20.8 +/- 23 s when the ETT cuff was inflated in the pharynx and 60.1 +/- 56 s when using fiberoptic laryngoscopy (P < 0.01). We conclude that both ETT cuff inflation in the pharynx and fiberoptic bronchoscopy are valuable for nasotracheal intubation in patients with an immobilized cervical spine and that ETT cuff inflation can be used as an alternative to fiberoptic bronchoscopy in patients with CSI.
We compared the technique of endotracheal tube cuff inflation in the pharynx for blind nasotracheal intubation in patients with an immobilized cervical spine with fiberoptic bronchoscopy. There was no significant difference between the success rates of the techniques.
气管插管在颈椎损伤(CSI)患者中可能会带来问题。在无CSI的患者中,通过使气管内导管(ETT)咽部套囊充气可提高盲目经鼻气管插管的成功率。本研究的目的是评估咽部ETT套囊充气作为颈椎固定患者盲目经鼻气管插管辅助手段的有效性。将该技术与纤维支气管镜检查进行比较。20例接受择期手术且需经鼻气管插管的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况I级和II级患者纳入了这项前瞻性随机研究。每位患者的颈椎均被固定。每位患者的气管插管两次,一次使用纤维支气管镜检查,另一次使用咽部ETT套囊充气技术盲目插管。使用ETT套囊充气进行插管时最多允许3次尝试。使用纤维支气管镜检查进行插管时最多允许3分钟。使用ETT套囊充气时,20例患者中有19例(95%)插管成功;20例患者中有14例(70%)首次插管成功。使用纤维支气管镜检查时,20例患者中有19例(95%)插管成功。咽部ETT套囊充气时平均插管时间为20.8±23秒,使用纤维喉镜检查时为60.1±56秒(P<0.01)。我们得出结论,咽部ETT套囊充气和纤维支气管镜检查对于颈椎固定患者的经鼻气管插管均有价值,并且在CSI患者中ETT套囊充气可作为纤维支气管镜检查的替代方法。
我们将颈椎固定患者盲目经鼻气管插管的咽部气管内导管套囊充气技术与纤维支气管镜检查进行了比较。两种技术的成功率之间无显著差异。