Otsuji Y, Gilon D, Jiang L, He S, Leavitt M, Roy M J, Birmingham M J, Levine R A
Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114-2698, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Aug;32(2):398-404. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00237-x.
We tested the hypothesis that patients with incomplete systolic mitral leaflet closure (IMLC: apically displaced coaptation) also have restricted diastolic leaflet opening that is independent of mitral inflow volume and provides evidence supporting increased leaflet tethering.
Competing hypotheses for functional mitral regurgitation (MR) with IMLC include global left ventricular (LV) dysfunction per se (reduced leaflet closing force) versus geometric distortion of the mitral apparatus by LV dilation (augmented leaflet tethering). These are inseparable in systole, but restricted leaflet motion has also been observed in diastole, and attributed to reduced mitral inflow.
Diastolic mitral leaflet excursion and orifice area were measured by two-dimensional echocardiography in 58 patients with global LV dysfunction, 36 with and 22 without IMLC, compared with 21 normal subjects. The biplane Simpson's method was used to calculate LV ejection volume, which equals mitral inflow volume in the absence of aortic regurgitation.
The diastolic mitral leaflet excursion angle was markedly reduced in patients with IMLC compared with those without IMLC, whose ventricles were smaller, and normal subjects (17 +/- 10 degrees vs. 58 +/- 13 degrees vs. 67 +/- 8 degrees, p < 0.0001). Excursion angle was dissociated from mitral inflow volume (r2 = 0.04); excursion was reduced in patients with IMLC despite a normal inflow volume in the larger ventricles with MR (60 +/- 25 vs. 61 +/- 12 ml in normal subjects, p = NS), and excursion was nearly normal in patients without IMLC despite reduced inflow volume (40 +/- 10 ml, p < 0.001 vs. normal subjects). The anterior leaflet when maximally open coincided well with the line connecting its attachments to the anterior annulus and papillary muscle tip (angular difference = 3 +/- 7 degrees vs. 25 +/- 9 degrees vs. 32 +/- 10 degrees in patients with and without IMLC vs. normal subjects, p < 0.0001). In patients with IMLC, the leaflet tip orifice was smaller in an anteroposterior direction but wider than in the other groups, giving a normal total area (6.8 +/- 1.8 vs. 7.1 +/- 1.2 vs. 6.9 +/- 0.8 cm2, p = NS).
Patients with LV dysfunction and systolic IMLC also have restricted diastolic leaflet excursion that is independent of inflow volume, coincides with the tethering line connecting the annulus and papillary muscle and reflects limitation of anterior motion relative to the posteriorly placed papillary muscles without a decrease in total orifice area. These observations are consistent with increased tethering by displaced mitral leaflet attachments in the dilated ventricles of patients with IMLC that can restrict both diastolic opening and systolic closure.
我们检验了这样一个假设,即收缩期二尖瓣叶闭合不全(IMLC:瓣叶对合点向心尖移位)的患者舒张期瓣叶开放也受限,且这种受限与二尖瓣流入量无关,并为瓣叶牵拉增加提供了证据支持。
IMLC导致功能性二尖瓣反流(MR)的相互竞争的假说是,整体左心室(LV)功能障碍本身(瓣叶关闭力降低)与LV扩张导致二尖瓣装置几何形状改变(瓣叶牵拉增加)。在收缩期这两者难以区分,但舒张期也观察到瓣叶运动受限,且归因于二尖瓣流入量减少。
采用二维超声心动图测量58例整体LV功能障碍患者的舒张期二尖瓣叶偏移和瓣口面积,其中36例有IMLC,22例无IMLC,与21名正常受试者进行比较。采用双平面辛普森法计算LV射血容积,在无主动脉反流时其等于二尖瓣流入量。
与无IMLC且心室较小的患者及正常受试者相比,有IMLC的患者舒张期二尖瓣叶偏移角度明显减小(分别为17±10度、58±13度和67±8度,p<0.0001)。偏移角度与二尖瓣流入量无关(r2 = 0.04);有IMLC的患者偏移减小,尽管存在MR的较大心室中流入量正常(正常受试者为60±25 vs. 61±12 ml,p无统计学意义),而无IMLC的患者尽管流入量减少(40±10 ml,与正常受试者相比p<0.001),但偏移几乎正常。前叶最大开放时与连接其附着点至前瓣环和乳头肌尖端的线吻合良好(有和无IMLC的患者与正常受试者的角度差分别为3±7度、25±9度和32±10度,p<0.0001)。有IMLC的患者,瓣叶尖端瓣口在前后方向较小,但比其他组宽,总瓣口面积正常(分别为6.8±1.8、7.1±l.2和6.9±0.8 cm2,p无统计学意义)。
LV功能障碍和收缩期IMLC的患者舒张期瓣叶偏移也受限,且与流入量无关,与连接瓣环和乳头肌的牵拉线吻合,反映相对于后置乳头肌的前向运动受限,而总瓣口面积无减小。这些观察结果与IMLC患者扩张心室中二尖瓣叶附着点移位导致的牵拉增加一致,这种牵拉可限制舒张期开放和收缩期关闭。