Sundereswaran L, Nagueh S F, Vardan S, Middleton K J, Zoghbi W A, Quiñones M A, Torre-Amione G
Baylor College of Medicine and Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Aug 1;82(3):352-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00346-4.
Current Doppler methods have been unreliable in estimating filling pressures in heart transplants. Tissue Doppler imaging is a technique that permits evaluation of myocardial relaxation; combined with transvalvular E velocity, it could improve estimation of these pressures. To investigate this possibility, we evaluated 50 patients by right-sided cardiac catheterization and Doppler echocardiography simultaneously. Their mean +/-SD age was 53+/-15 years and the mean age of donor hearts was 30+/-12.5 years. The mitral E velocity was combined with the early myocardial relaxation (Ea) velocity by tissue Doppler at the lateral border of the mitral annulus. Likewise, the tricuspid E velocity was combined with Ea at the lateral corner of the tricuspid annulus. Mean wedge pressure related weakly to mitral inflow variables but strongly to E/Ea [r=0.8; wedge pressure=2.6+1.46(E/Ea)]. In 25 repeat right-sided cardiac catheterizations, changes in mean wedge pressure were well detected by Doppler, with a mean difference of -0.7+/-3 mm Hg. Mean right atrial pressure related weakly to routine tricuspid inflow variables but strongly to tricuspid E/Ea [r=0.79; n=38; right atrial pressure=1.76(E/Ea) - 3.7]. In 18 repeat right-sided cardiac catheterizations, changes in mean right atrial pressure were well detected by Doppler, with a mean difference of 0+/-3.45 mm Hg. Mean wedge pressure and mean right atrial pressure can be estimated in heart transplants with reasonable accuracy using the ratio of E/Ea. Furthermore, this method can accurately track changes in filling pressures.
目前的多普勒方法在估计心脏移植中的充盈压方面一直不可靠。组织多普勒成像技术可用于评估心肌舒张功能;结合跨瓣E波速度,它可以改善对这些压力的估计。为了研究这种可能性,我们同时通过右侧心导管检查和多普勒超声心动图对50例患者进行了评估。他们的平均年龄±标准差为53±15岁,供体心脏的平均年龄为30±12.5岁。二尖瓣E波速度与二尖瓣环外侧缘组织多普勒的早期心肌舒张(Ea)速度相结合。同样,三尖瓣E波速度与三尖瓣环外侧角的Ea相结合。平均楔压与二尖瓣流入变量的相关性较弱,但与E/Ea的相关性较强[r = 0.8;楔压=2.6 + 1.46(E/Ea)]。在25次重复的右侧心导管检查中,多普勒能很好地检测到平均楔压的变化,平均差值为-0.7±3 mmHg。平均右心房压与常规三尖瓣流入变量的相关性较弱,但与三尖瓣E/Ea的相关性较强[r = 0.79;n = 38;右心房压=1.76(E/Ea) - 3.7]。在18次重复的右侧心导管检查中,多普勒能很好地检测到平均右心房压的变化,平均差值为0±3.45 mmHg。使用E/Ea比值可以合理准确地估计心脏移植中的平均楔压和平均右心房压。此外,该方法可以准确跟踪充盈压的变化。