• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

救护车分流。美国急诊医疗服务医师协会标准与临床实践委员会

Ambulance diversion. Standards and Clinical Practices Committee, National Association of EMS Physicians.

作者信息

Glushak C, Delbridge T R, Garrison H G

机构信息

University of Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 1997 Apr-Jun;1(2):100-3. doi: 10.1080/10903129708958797.

DOI:10.1080/10903129708958797
PMID:9709347
Abstract

Policies regarding ambulance diversion are critical to ensuring that EMS providers are aware of appropriate patient destinations, even before patients enter the system. Field EMS personnel should never be requested to prolong transport time intervals to search for an available hospital at the potential expense of patients' conditions and the immediate availability of out-of-hospital emergency care for the community. The responsibility for providing efficient emergency care to the community rests with all those who contribute to EMS structures and processes. All EMS system participants, including hospitals, EMS providers, local and regional lead agencies, and medical oversight authorities, must work together to create comprehensive ambulance diversion policies that satisfactorily meet each other's needs, while maintaining the highest regard for the needs of EMS patients and the entire community.

摘要

关于救护车分流的政策对于确保紧急医疗服务(EMS)提供者在患者进入系统之前就知晓合适的患者接收地点至关重要。现场EMS人员绝不应该被要求延长转运时间间隔去寻找有空余床位的医院,以免可能损害患者病情以及社区院外急救的即时可得性。为社区提供高效急救护理的责任落在所有参与EMS架构和流程的人员身上。所有EMS系统参与者,包括医院、EMS提供者、地方和区域牵头机构以及医疗监管当局,必须共同努力制定全面的救护车分流政策,在充分满足彼此需求的同时,始终高度重视EMS患者和整个社区的需求。

相似文献

1
Ambulance diversion. Standards and Clinical Practices Committee, National Association of EMS Physicians.救护车分流。美国急诊医疗服务医师协会标准与临床实践委员会
Prehosp Emerg Care. 1997 Apr-Jun;1(2):100-3. doi: 10.1080/10903129708958797.
2
Ambulance diversion and emergency department offload delay: resource document for the National Association of EMS Physicians position statement.救护车转院和急诊部门卸荷延迟:美国急诊医师学会立场声明的资源文件。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Oct-Dec;15(4):555-61. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.608871.
3
Statewide Method of Measuring Ambulance Patient Offload Times.全州范围的救护车患者下车时间测量方法。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 May-Jun;23(3):319-326. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1525456. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
4
Alternate ambulance transportation and destination. National Association of EMS Physicians/American College of Emergency Physicians Joint Position Paper.替代救护车运输与目的地。美国急诊医师协会/美国急诊医师学会联合立场文件。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2001 Jul-Sep;5(3):289. doi: 10.1080/10903120190939823.
5
Ambulance diversion and emergency department offload delay.救护车转院和急诊部门卸车延迟。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Oct-Dec;15(4):543. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.598620. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
6
Impact of an emergency department closure on the local emergency medical services system.急诊科关闭对当地紧急医疗服务系统的影响。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):198-203. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.640418. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
7
Department of Transportation (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the American Medical Association Commission on Emergency Medical Services air ambulance guidelines.
Emerg Med Serv. 1989 Dec;18(11):262.
8
Trial to end ambulance diversion in Boston: report from the conference of the Boston teaching hospitals consortium.波士顿终止救护车分流的试验:来自波士顿教学医院联盟会议的报告。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011 Apr;26(2):122-6. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X11000070.
9
Comparing Methodologies for Evaluating Emergency Medical Services Ground Transport Access to Time-critical Emergency Services: A Case Study Using Trauma Center Care.比较评估紧急医疗服务地面交通获取时间关键紧急服务的方法:以创伤中心救治为例的案例研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;19(9):E1099-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01440.x.
10
The Medical Duty Officer: An Attempt to Mitigate the Ambulance At-Hospital Interval.医疗值班官员:缩短救护车到院间隔时间的一次尝试。
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;17(5):662-8. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.7.30266. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
A review on ambulance offload delay literature.救护车下客延误文献综述。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2019 Dec;22(4):658-675. doi: 10.1007/s10729-018-9450-x. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
2
Factors associated with the difficulty in hospital acceptance at the scene by emergency medical service personnel: a population-based study in Osaka City, Japan.与紧急医疗服务人员在现场难以将患者送入医院相关的因素:日本大阪市的一项基于人群的研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 26;6(10):e013849. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013849.